RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01408
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His duty history be updated to reflect C-130J Aircraft
Maintenance Unit (AMU) Officer in Charge (OIC) as his duty
title for the period 15 Feb 12 to 2 Jan 13.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The duty title in question is missing from his records. He held
this position from 15 Feb 12 through 2 Jan 13. He provided an
AF Form 911, Enlisted Performance Report (MSgt thru CMSgt),
where he signed as the additional rater with the duty title of
C-130J/Gold AMU OIC as proof he held the position.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade
of first lieutenant (O-2).
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPALO recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error or an injustice. There is no evidence to confirm the
applicant held the position of C-130J AMU OIC. His officer
performance report (OPR) for the period closing 4 Mar 12, which
includes part of the timeframe in question, reflects his duty
title as Assistant OIC, C-130H Aircraft Maintenance Unit.
Furthermore, the EPR provided by the applicant cannot serve as
proof of his duty title as a matter of record as the report
pertains to someone else. Additionally, the requested duty
title of C-130J AMU OIC is not reflected on the EPR. The
applicants duty title as of 7 Jan 13 was Support Flight
Commander.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPALO evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 3 May 13 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-01408 in Executive Session on 23 Jan 14, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Mar 13, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPALO, dated 15 Apr 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 May 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00234
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00234 CASE NUMBER: 5 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 JUL 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) for the Calendar Year 2003B (CY03B) Major Central Selection Board be corrected to reflect his correct duty history and that he receive...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00055
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00055 INDEX CODE: 111.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 July 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The duty title on his Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period of 10 November 2004 through 9 November 2005 be changed to reflect “OIC, ACC Regional...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01739
The AFOSR-S and the AFOSR-L were authorized on 12 Oct 80, and awarded to Air Force active duty, Reserve, and National Guard personnel who have been awarded credit for an OS tour after 1 Sep 80. In this regard, the AFOSR-S and the AFOSR-L were authorized on 12 Oct 80 for those members who had been credited with an OS tour after 1 Sep 80. The applicant did not complete an OS tour after that date.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03836
However, his chain of command fabricated two additional LORs in order to involuntarily dismiss him from the military, and then denied his reenlistment in Mar 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an...
Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. E. F. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions Addendum to Air Force Advisory Opinion AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S A I R F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H A I R F O R C E E A S E T E X A S MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR 12 Jun 98 FROM: HQ AFPCDPPPEP 550 C Street West Ste 07 Randolph AFB TX 78 150-4709 SUB cords (DD Form 149) REQUESTED ACTION:...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00431
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSID recommends the associated EPR be voided if the associated FAs are invalidated, as it appears the EPR was a result of the FA failures. Consequently, based on our above determination and since AFPC/DPSID has indicated the report should be removed in its entirety if the Board determines the FA failures should be invalidated, we recommend the referral EPR be declared void and removed from his records. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01850
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial of the requested relief as the documentation on file in the master personnel records supports the basis for discharge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and after reviewing the evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01485
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPO recommends the Board approve the applicant’s request to award him the AFCM for the period 29 November 1989 to 4 September 1992 based on their review of his application and supporting documentation. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s counsel responded that by recommending the Air Force Commendation Medal...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00872
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was demoted to staff sergeant (SSgt) less than two years before his retirement. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00163
On 1 Mar 04, HQ AFPC/DPPPRA advised the applicant that his records did not indicate he was deployed to the Persian Gulf in direct support of Operation Southern Watch, and the locally-produced certificate for the AFEM was not a valid or official document. The applicant submitted a locally produced certificate for the AFEM in support of Operation Southern Watch for the period of 10 Jan 99-3 Mar 99. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...