Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01337
Original file (BC-2013-01337.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01337
	 		COUNSEL: NONE
 			HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage and deductions be terminated.

_______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He converted his military time to civil service time for the purpose of drawing civil service retirement pay and will not receive military retired pay.  

He faxed a waiver of military retirement to the Defense Finance Accounting Service (DFAS) and was not aware that there were additional requirements or forms necessary to stop the SBP from military retired pay.    

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of SF Form 310, Federal Employee Retirement System Retirement Application, letter from spouse declining SBP, a personal statement and various other documents associated with his request.  

His complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_______________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit B.  

_______________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPFFF recommends denial.   The applicant retired from the Air Force effective 1 Dec 1993.  Prior to retirement, he elected spouse only SBP coverage based on full retired pay and premiums began on 1 Jan 1994.  DFAS records show that effective 31 Jan 2013, the applicant waived his Air Force retired pay to combine civilian and military service credits.  During the civil service retirement processing, he declined survivor annuity coverage and the finance center established a direct remittance account for future military SBP payments.  Since the applicant did not elect to participate in the civil service annuity program; the applicant’s military SBP remains in effect for his spouse.  There is no evidence of an error or injustice.  The law provides the option to maintain military SBP or elect the civil service survivor annuity program but does not authorize cancellation or disenrollment from military SBP.   

The complete DPFFF evaluation is at Exhibit B.

_______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 7 June 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).

_______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:


1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_____________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_______________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2013-01337 in Executive Session on 7 Nov 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	 , Panel Chair
         , Member
	 , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:  

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Mar 2013, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPFFF, dated 22 May 2013.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Jun 2013.




				Panel Chair			 															Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00425

    Original file (BC-2013-00425.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval, stating, in part, there is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's record to show he elected former spouse coverage based on full retired pay effective 25 Jan 07, naming the former spouse as the eligible beneficiary. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02670

    Original file (BC 2013 02670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law (PL) 99-145 requires spouses of married service members to concur in writing, prior to the service member’s retirement in SBP elections that provide less than full spouse coverage. The applicant was briefed on the options and effects of the SBP, and elected to decline SBP coverage prior to his 1 Aug 12 retirement. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Aug 13.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03356

    Original file (BC 2013 03356.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She does not recall receiving a letter from the Air Force informing her of her spouse’s decision to decline SBP participation. There is no record the required notice was sent to the applicant and the applicant has provided a sworn statement that the notification was not received. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 13.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02340

    Original file (BC 2013 02340.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his retirement, he elected child only coverage for his disabled child. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends granting the requested relief in the interest of justice. In addition if the service member elected child coverage in conjunction with an election for spouse, or elects child only coverage, the SBP annuity may...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04943

    Original file (BC-2012-04943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The parties divorced on 5 Jun 98, and in the Child Custody Marital Dissolution Agreement, incorporated in the divorce decree, the member agreed the applicant would receive survivor benefits from his military retirement. There is no evidence of Air Force error, and absent a competing claimant, we recommend the member's record be corrected to reflect that he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay and named the applicant as the eligible former spouse...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04695

    Original file (BC 2013 04695.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Another dependent child was born on 4 December 1981 after the decedent’s retirement. DPFFF states there is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, they recommend the record be corrected. The member’s record should be corrected to reflect he elected spouse and child coverage based on full retired pay effective 1 August 1980, and his son is permanently incapable of self- support.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04195

    Original file (BC-2012-04195.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), with is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval due to the possibility of an administrative error. However, on 31 March 2011, the day prior to the effective date of his retirement, the applicant submitted an SBP election change to decline...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00125

    Original file (BC 2014 00125.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends the requested relief be granted. Under the provisions of SBP, the spouses of married service members had to be informed when the service member declined SBP coverage, or elected less than the maximum level of coverage. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFFF...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02998

    Original file (BC 2013 02998.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no evidence either party submitted a valid former spouse election during the required time following their divorce. Neither the applicant nor the former spouse submitted a valid election within the one-year period required by law to establish former spouse coverage. Exhibit D. Letter, Member, dated 3 Sep 2013, w/atch.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00566

    Original file (BC-2013-00566.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPFFF recommends the former service member’s record be corrected to show he elected spouse only SBP coverage based on full retired pay effective 31 January 1973. Since it appears the applicant has not provided the requested information, the Board must deny the applicant’s request at this time. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...