Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05735
Original file (BC-2012-05735.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-05735
		
		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His fitness assessment (FA), dated 15 November 2012, be removed 
from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was injured while conducting [sic] the run portion of the 
fitness assessment and notified the Unit Fitness Program Manager 
(UFPM). The Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC) entered the 
unsatisfactory result prior to his UFPM having the opportunity 
to ask them to hold the score until he was seen by a medical 
provider.  

After completing the assessment, he immediately scheduled an 
appointment with a medical provider.  He was diagnosed with a 
lower leg injury.  As such, the FA score should be invalid.  

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides the DA Form 
3349, Physical Profile.
 
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of master sergeant.  

A resume of the applicant’s FA results are as follows:

Date 
Composite Score
Rating
 19 Feb 13
87.75 
Satisfactory 
*15 Nov 12
35.10
Unsatisfactory
 12 Apr 12
75.10
Satisfactory 
  1 Sep 11
80.70
Satisfactory
 14 Jul 11
71.60
Unsatisfactory
 29 Dec 10
83.00
Satisfactory
* Contested FAs

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this case are 
contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility which is at Exhibit B. 

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial.  The applicant took his FA on 
15 November 2012, scoring a composite score of 35.10, 
unsatisfactory.  Immediately following the FA, he scheduled an 
appointment for treatment at the military treatment facility 
(MTF) and was diagnosed with an injury to his lower leg.  He was 
placed on a medical waiver exempting him from the run component 
of the FA; however, the waiver cleared him for the walk, sit-up 
and push-up component of the FA.

AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, states if an airman becomes 
injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all 
required components, he or she will have the option of being 
evaluated at the MTF, but his or her test will count unless 
rendered invalid by the Unit Commander.  

The applicant did obtain medical attention following his FA; 
however, there is no indication the commander invalidated the 
FA.  There is also no evidence to support invalidating the 
entire assessment.

The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 22 March 2013, for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit C).  As of this date, this office has received 
no response.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant 
removal of the contested FA in its entirety.  In view of the 
above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis upon which to recommend favorable consideration of his 
request to remove the contested FA from the AFFMS. 

4.  Notwithstanding the above determination, we believe some 
relief is warranted.  Based on the evidence provided, we believe 
the applicant was injured during the FA and this injury had a 
direct impact on his ability to pass the cardio component of the 
FA.  Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be 
corrected only to the extent indicated below.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the 
cardio component of the Fitness Assessment dated 15 November 
2012, be amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness 
Management System. 

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-05735 in Executive Session on 4 September 2013 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


All members voted to correct the record, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 6 Dec 12, w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 7 Mar 13, w/atch.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Mar 13.













Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02587

    Original file (BC 2013 02587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his claim, the applicant has submitted a letter from his UFPM and a Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical care, indicating that he had an illness, precluding him from finishing and passing the contested FA and memorandum from his UFPM (not dated) to the Force Support Squadron commander requesting removal of the contested FA from AFFMS. If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided.” A list of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02580

    Original file (BC 2013 02580.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A list of the applicant’s complete FA history is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 4 Aug 2013 33.00 17:41/0.00 Unsatisfactory *5 May 2013 26.50 INC/0.00 Unsatisfactory 14 May 2012 91.70 12:19/57.60 Satisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of “Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02692

    Original file (BC 2013 02692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. A list of the applicant’s last five FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 26 Jul 2013 79.30 Satisfactory *30 Apr 2013 36.50 Unsatisfactory 12 Oct 2012 81.90 Satisfactory 3 Oct 2012 71.60 Unsatisfactory 15 May 2012 Exempt Exempt *Contested FA On 7 Jan 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of “Insufficient evidence; specifically no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03908

    Original file (BC 2013 03908.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 Nov 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA and failed to attain the minimum score in the cardio component. On 14 Feb 14, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) disapproved the applicant’s request for relief on the basis that the applicant should not have completed the contested FAs once she became injured; additionally, the applicant did not provide a commander’s invalidation memorandum invalidating contested FAs. For Regular Air Force and AGR, they will enter the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02331

    Original file (BC 2013 02331.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 2 Jan 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 Feb 14, applicant provided a memorandum in rebuttal of AFPC/DPSIM and FAAB memoranda. While we note an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02538

    Original file (BC 2013 02538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For RegAF and AGR Airmen, the FAC (or UFPM where no FAC exists) will enter the FA results in AFFMS on the 6th duty day if the Commander does not invalidate test results or no response from the Commander is received within this timeframe;” Atch 1, Para 10a. Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum).” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove the contested FA from AFFMS,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02983

    Original file (BC 2013 02983.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02983 in Executive Session on 30 Apr 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member ? Exhibit C. Letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02467

    Original file (BC 2013 02467.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 2 Jan 14, the request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of “Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical documentation from an Air Force doctor.” In accordance with (IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_ Fitness Program AFGM5 (3 Jan 13), Attachment 1, Section 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03180

    Original file (BC 2013 03180 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03180 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 15 Aug 12 be removed from his records. The applicant contends that he suffered from a medical condition that precluded him from passing the contested FA and, thus, said FA should be removed from his records. While we...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04146

    Original file (BC 2013 04146.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant did not provide any documentation describing the injury and why he could not pass the contested FAs. If the FA is invalidated, the Airman will be required to retest on all non-exempt FA components within five duty days from original FA test date. NOTE: Original FA will count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander.” In accordance with guidance at the time of...