RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05638
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 September 2012 be removed
from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The individual counting his sit-up repetitions reported the
incorrect number of sit-ups to the Fitness Assessment Cell
(FAC). The counter reported 35; however, during the FA he asked
the counter how many repetitions had he counted and he indicated
45. Knowing that 41 was the minimum number of sit-ups he had to
complete to receive points in that category, he stopped due to
muscle fatigue.
In support of the applicants appeal, he provides a personal
statement and a report of individual fitness.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of senior airman.
The applicants last five FA scores are as follows:
COMPOSITE
DATE SCORE RATING
12 August 2010 84.50 SATISFACTORY
8 March 2011 87.00 SATISFACTORY
8 September 2011 90.20 EXCELLENT
* 12 September 2012 82.90 UNSATISFACTORY
19 September 2012 84.60 SATISFACTORY
*Contested FA score.
________________________________________________________________
_
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states there is not enough
evidence to indicate whether or not the counter provided the
incorrect number of sit-ups during the 12 September 2012 FA.
The applicant has failed to clearly demonstrate an error or
injustice.
The DPSIM complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit
B.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 6 April 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within
30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been
received by this office.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the
applicant's contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA
is in error or unjust. In this respect, we note the applicant
has failed to provide any documentary evidence in support of his
appeal. In view of the above and in the absence of evidence to
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-05638 in Executive Session on 12 September 2013,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 November 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 1 April 2013, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 April 2013.
3
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04659
Upon completion of the sit-up assessment, the counter identified to the Fitness Assessment Cell that his sit- up count was off by 4. We took note of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find insufficient evidence of an error or injustice to warrant removal of the contested FA in its entirety. We took note of the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility to correct the sit-up component of the contested FA to reflect 45 and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00727
The counter only counted 42 sit ups when he actually completed 55. An e-mail from the counter shows her error when counting the applicants sit ups. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show the fitness assessment dated 26 April 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03983
Additionally, the FAC waited until 45 seconds into the assessment to tell the applicant to fix her body. She has never failed an FA before or since the contested assessment. FAC augmentee or another member paired to accomplish muscle fitness components will monitor and count the correct number of push-ups. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Mar 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01550
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01550 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 19 Dec 12 and a duplicate FA entry dated 1 Sep 10 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). He received an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member's Qualification Status, dated 9...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04530
_______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The number of sit-ups she performed during the contested FA were inaccurately counted. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02524
This will count as one sit-up. The applicants last 3 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Sit-ups Rating 22 Mar 2013 94.80 49 Excellent *05 Mar 2013 85.30 39 Unsatisfactory 05 Mar 2012 93.70 47 Excellent *Contested FA On 16 Oct 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence; specifically witness statement to support injustice. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05851
On 28 June 2012, the applicants alternate Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM) recommended her 30 May 2012 FA be voided due to the discrepancy in the manner of how her push-ups were counted and her re-test rating of excellent. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicants complete submission, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) to correct AFFMS to reflect the applicant was exempt from the push-up...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00002
On 5 Nov 12, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining a composite score of 86.30, which constituted a satisfactory assessment where she was credited with 30 pushups.. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. However, a FAC staff member subsequently informed her that her form was incorrect. Regardless of whether the push-ups were counted or not, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03583
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03583 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 14 May 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). Moreover, the FAC managers opinion is based on a demonstration by the applicant after the contested FA was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03686
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03686 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) test score dated 23 Apr 12, be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). Upon taking the retest, the applicant was again successful in completing his FA as he was in many occasions...