AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00170
A copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B. Other than his own assertions, the applicant has provided no evidence showing he and his crew were “redlined” for pay. However, should the applicant obtain information regarding his pay or assignments during that time, he may, of course, request reconsideration of this application and we would review this new evidence.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00175
However, the form stated he could enroll in the program at any time during his service on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to his VEAP, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAT recommends the application be denied. The applicant did not make a timely request nor provide evidence of government error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00178
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 28 Sep 79, the former member executed DD Form 1883, Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, electing no coverage under Option A (Defer). Applicant’s counsel also provided copies of the member’s ARPC Form 0-69 (Application for Retired Pay), and DD Form 2656, which were signed by the member on 26 May 02. Specifically, under Option A, the member declined to make an election at that time,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00179
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 28 February 2002, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force (RegAF) in the grade of Airman First Class (E-3). At the time of enlistment, the applicant both initialed and signed an AF Form 3006, Enlistment Agreement - Prior Service, stating, “I am enlisting in pay grade E-3.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00180
INDEX CODE 112.07 AFBCMR BC-2004-00180 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00182
Has 20 or more years of active service in the Uniformed Services for the purpose of computing the amount of retired pay, or is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of Title 10, United States Code, unless such retirement is under section 12731b of that same title. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00183
They recommended that discharge was in the best interest of the Air Force and the applicant. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00184
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00184 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His grade on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect senior airman, rather than airman first class. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00186
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00186 INDEX CODE: 131.00, 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), Third Oak Leaf Cluster (3OLC), for the period 3 August 1997 to 27 February 2001, be upgraded to a Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) and he be considered for promotion to the grade...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00187
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00187 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Meritorious Service Medal, First Oak Leaf Cluster (MSM) (1OLC)), that he was awarded for the period 25 Apr 00 to 1 Apr 03, be included in his officer selection record (OSR) for the Calendar Year 2003A (CY03A) Lieutenant...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00188
In support of his request, applicant provided his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty; Western Union telegrams, his retirement order, and documents extracted from his medical record. DPPPR states to be awarded the PH a member must provide documentation to support that wounds were received as a direct result of enemy action and that the wounds received treatment by medical personnel. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 26 Apr 04, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00189
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00189 (CASE 2) INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 1994A (CY94A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board be voided and replaced with a reaccomplished PRF. On 1 Nov 01, the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00199
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00199 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was promoted to the grade of first lieutenant prior to the time he was a Prisoner of War (POW) and that he was promoted to the grade of captain based on his status as a...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00201
On 7 October 1998, the applicant’s commander notified the applicant he was recommending her discharge from the United States Air Force for Mental Disorders. Evidence of the record shows that the applicant’s depressed mood resolved by the time of her separation, consistent with her diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder. Following discharge, the applicant experienced recurrent symptoms of depression and developed Major Depressive Disorder with psychosis in January 2004, five years after her discharge.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00202
He served in the Army Reserves from 27 Mar 03 through 15 Oct 03. One of the eligibility requirements for a prior service or reenlistment bonus is that members have less than 14 years of service based on pay date. At the time of his enlistment on 16 Oct 03, he was over 14 years.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00205
A copy of the AFDRB Hearing Record is attached at Exhibit C. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report, which is attached at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that based on the documentation pertaining to the applicant’s PRP permanent decertification, the discharge action would have...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00206
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She believes that the narrative reason “unsatisfactory performance” holds her solely responsible for training she did not receive prior to testing for her upgrade training. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case, however; we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00208
AFBCMR BC-2004-00208 INDEX CODE: 102.3 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. BRENDA L. ROMINE Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPPOO, dtd 18 Feb 04 AFBCMR BC-2004-00208 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00210
INDEX CODE: 112.05 AFBCMR BC-2004-00210 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00211
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00211 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His nonjudicial punishment under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) be set aside, his general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable, and his “2B” reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that he...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00215
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00215 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 2B be changed so that he may reenter the service. AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00221
INDEX CODE: 131.10 BC-2004-00221 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00223
On 10 Sep 03, the Board did not restore his SSgt grade but instead promoted him to senior airman effective 9 Apr 03 and waived the HYT restriction so he could be eligible for promotion consideration by the 04E5 cycle. His present reenlistment (RE) code of 4D renders him ineligible to reenlist because of HYT restrictions, i.e., he has not yet been promoted to SSgt. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPRR notes the applicant is not reenlistment eligible,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00224
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00224 INDEX NUMBER: 131.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to retain the date of rank (DOR), 1 May 94, of his promotion to staff sergeant (SSgt) while in the Air Force Reserve. On 17 Aug 93, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00225
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2004-00225 IDEX CODE 131.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Assignment History section of his Officer Selection Brief (OSB) reflect a command level of “NAF” versus “DD/J” for the 23 Dec 97 entry, and the 30 Nov 99 entry be removed in its entirety. A complete copy of the evaluation is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00231
AFBCMR BC-2004-00231 INDEX NUMBER: 112.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00232
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. After consulting with military counsel, he waived his rights associated with an administrative discharge board hearing contingent upon his receipt of an honorable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2004-00232 in Executive Session on 1 June 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00233
He requested SBP spouse coverage in September 2003 and was informed he could not elect spouse coverage due to the one- year time limit. Although the applicant contends he was not aware of the one-year time limit, the Afterburner, News For USAF Retired Personnel, informed retired servicemembers of the requirement to elect coverage within the first year of marriage for a newly acquired spouse. In this respect, a member who is not married at the time of retirement and marries later may elect...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00235
On 30 September 1981, an Article 15 for absenting himself from his place of duty without authority, from 16 September 1981 to 18 September 1981, and failing to go to his place of duty on 14 September 1981. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that he makes no excuses nor does he deny any of the facts concerning his general discharge. He can...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00238
AFBCMR BC-2004-00238 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00241
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00241 INDEX CODE: 131.09 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be directly promoted to the grade of colonel as though selected by the Calendar Year 2000A (CY00A) Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB). Based on the lack of evidence the applicant’s 24 Dec 98 OPR and his CY00A PRF were in...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00246
In the fall of 00, a cadet in the applicant’s squadron told him about the “positive” effects of using Ecstasy. Around Sep/Oct 00, the applicant purchased pills from this cadet, who told him they were Ecstasy. It could not be determined if the pills were, in fact, Ecstasy.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00252
On 18 October 2000, HQ USAF/JAG reviewed the BOI record and found it legally sufficient to support the recommendation that the applicant be separated from the Air Force with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge On 29 November 2000, the Secretary of the Air Force directed the applicant be separated from the United States Air Force with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. He hereby request the Board to review these facts and circumstances of injustice and that his...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00254
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states the applicant has not submitted any evidence nor identified any errors or injustices that occurred in the processing of his discharge. Based on the information and evidence provided they recommend the request be denied (Exhibit D). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00259
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s records were apparently destroyed in the Jul 73 fire at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC). After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded his UOTHC discharge should be upgraded to honorable. Should the applicant provide additional evidence substantiating his contention that the basis of his UOTHC discharge was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00261
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. On 19 April 2004, the Board staff requested the applicant provide information regarding his post service activities. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004- 00261 in Executive Session on 15 June 2004, under the provisions of AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00265
He was separated from the Air Force on 13 July 2001, with an uncharacterized entry-level separation, and received an RE code of 2C ”Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service.” Since his enlistment was considered fraudulent, his total active service was not creditable. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00266
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommended denial and states after a thorough review of the applicant’s military records, they found no documentation to substantiate changing the applicant’s HOR. Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, he has provided no evidence, which would lead us to believe the HOR currently reflected in his records was incorrectly recorded at the time he was initially ordered to active duty. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00271
INDEX CODE: 131.10 BC-2004-00271 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00273
On 17 July 2002, he wrote a letter to his wing commander asking that an MEB be accomplished, that he be returned to active duty and entered into the Disability Evaluation System (DES), that he be provided all back pay to the point he was released from active duty and that he remain on active duty until the disposition of his case was finalized. DPPI’s complete evaluation, with attachment is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00274
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Based on information from the Air Force, applicant’s Master Military Pay Account (MMPA) reflects he initially lost 14 days of leave at the end of FY01 (30 Sep 01); however, those 14 days were restored under the 9/11 Special Leave Accural (SLA) policy. The office of primary responsibility has indicated that the applicant’s Master Military Pay Account (MMPA) reflects he initially lost 14 days of leave...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00275
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00275 INDEX CODE: 137.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election, made on 23 July 1986, be changed from full SBP coverage to cover the period between December 1997 and 28 October 2003 only. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00277
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00277 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be promoted to the grade of master sergeant. He served duties as a master sergeant but was never promoted. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPWB...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00278
Furthermore, in view of the repeated misconduct during his short period of service that resulted in his court-martial actions and subsequent discharge and the contents of the FBI Report of Investigation, we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of the applicant’s service on the basis of clemency is warranted. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, the applicant’s request for upgrade of his discharge is not favorably considered. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00281
INDEX CODE: 121.03 AFBCMR BC-2004-00281 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00282
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00282 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation that has been submitted in support of applicant's appeal,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00286
INDEX CODE: 112.05 AFBCMR BC-2004-00286 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00287
INDEX CODE: 136.01 AFBCMR BC-2004-00287 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00288
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She received an assignment notification to Incirlik ABS, Turkey, and was advised that she would have to extend for 14 months to obtain retainability for this assignment. On 15 August 2003 the applicant reenlisted in the United States Air Force for a period of 4 years and 18 months. DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00289
INDEX CODE: 112.05 AFBCMR BC-2004-00289 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be...