RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01856
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His bad conduct discharge be upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He feels that the initial cause of his problems in the service stemmed from
the mistreatment he received from his training officer. He had numerous
physical problems that interfered with the physical requirements required
of basic training. His training officer used him as an example and created
for him an extremely hostile environment that led him to commit numerous
Absences Without Leave (AWOLs). Since his experience in the service he has
led an exemplary life. He has been happily married for 32 years and has
been a contributor to his church and community. He has owned his own
business and has been extremely successful.
His actions of today show that he has become a contributing member of his
church and community. He feels that the problems he experienced in the Air
Force were not of his own doing and are not indicative of who he really is.
He did not realize that he only had 15 years to try to upgrade his
discharge. He has been diagnosed with lung cancer and would like to
correct the one truly bad thing that has occurred in his life, the
discharge he received from the Air Force. He feels he has lived a good and
giving life and would like any question of his military service be put to
rest. He requests that the Air Force look at what he has become, a pillar
of his community, and grant him his request to have his discharge upgraded
to honorable.
In support of his request, he submits a personal statement, character
references, a copy of his DD Form 214 and a copy of his discharge physical.
The applicant’s submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 29 February 1952, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the
grade of private (E-1) at the age of 17 with parental consent for a period
of 4 years.
From 25 July 1952 to 13 August 1952, he was charged with Absent Without
Leave (AWOL). For this incident, tried and convicted by a summary court-
martial. He was sentenced to perform hard labor for forty-five (45) days
and to forfeit fifty-five dollars ($55) of his pay.
From 6 September 1952 to 10 September 1952, he was charged with AWOL. For
this incident, he was tried and convicted by a summary court-martial. He
was ordered to perform hard labor for 15 days and to forfeit twenty dollars
($20) of his pay.
From 20 September 1952 to 9 October 1952, he was charged with AWOL. For
this incident, he was tried and convicted by a summary court-martial. He
was sentenced to be confined at hard labor for thirty (30) days and to
forfeit fifty dollars ($50) of his pay.
On 25 April 1968, the applicant was tried by a special court-martial for
violation of Article 86, Absent Without Leave (AWOL), from 29 December 1952
until 20 January 1953 and 23 January 1953 until 31 January 1953. He pled
not guilty, was found guilty and was sentenced to be discharged with a bad
conduct discharge, to be confined for three months, and to forfeit fifty-
five ($55) dollars for three months.
The applicant was discharged with a bad conduct discharge on 1 June 1953.
He had served 7 months and 22 days on active duty. He had 225 days lost
time due to AWOL and confinement.
On 28 May 1954, the Air Force Discharge Review Board reviewed and denied
applicant’s request that his discharge be upgraded.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the FBI provided a copy of an
Investigative Report, No. 601666B, which is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied. DPPRS states that based
upon the documentation in the file, the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. DPPRS
further states that the applicant has not provided any new evidence or
identified any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge
processing.
The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 15 July 2002, a letter was forwarded to applicant suggesting that the
applicant consider providing evidence pertaining to his post-service
activities. On 6 August 2002, the Division of Veterans’ Affairs, State of
New York, requested clemency be given to the applicant who has suffered
long enough for a mistake he made as a young man. This letter, with
attachments, is at Exhibit F.
On 18 July 2002, a copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the applicant
for review and comment. Applicant’s spouse responded by stating that they
were aware of the charges and that he has been forgiven. Her husband is a
great man and was a troubled youngster who most likely got involved with
the wrong crowd (Exhibit G).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. It appears that under the given
circumstances at that time, responsible officials applied appropriate
standards in effecting his discharge action. Applicant’s contentions and
supporting statements were duly noted. However, based on the short period
of time he served on active duty, the excessive amount of time lost to the
government and the limited evidence provided, in our estimation, the
evidence submitted is not of a sufficient quality and quantity to warrant
the approval of the requested relief. In addition, an FBI record provided
information pertaining to the applicant indicating involvement with law
enforcement authorities for approximately 35 years after his separation,
the most recent occurring approximately 13 years ago. In view of this fact
and in the absence of more expansive evidence by the applicant attesting to
a successful post-service adjustment in the years after his last
involvement with civil law enforcement authorities, we are not inclined to
extend clemency in this case.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 16 October 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr, Panel Chair
Mr. William H. Anderson, Member
Mr. Thomas J. Topolski, Jr, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 June 2002 w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 19 June 2002.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 June 2002.
Exhibit E. Letter, FBI Report, dated 31 July 2002.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 15 July 2002.
Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant’s Spouse, dated 11 August 2002.
ALBERT F. LOWAS, JR
Panel Chair
For this incident, he was ordered to be restricted to the limits of his squadron area for a period of sixty (60) days and to forfeit fifty dollars ($50) of his pay. On 19 November 1954, 3 August 1955 and 23 June 1958, the Air Force Discharge Review Board considered and denied the applicant’s requests for a discharge upgrade. On 12 July 2002, a letter from Congressman Markey’s office requesting assistance in upgrading applicant’s discharge was received by this office (Exhibit G).
On 19 February 1954, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-17 (Unfitness), with an undesirable discharge. We note that the applicant provided some character references pertaining to his post-service activities; however, the Board does not believe this evidence is sufficient to warrant clemency. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 5 December 2001, under...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00909
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00909 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to allow him to receive VA benefits. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01447
On 17 October 1951, the applicant was tried and convicted by a special court-martial for failing to obey a lawful order. For this incident he was confined at hard labor for four (4) months, and forfeited $50.00 per month for a like period. In response to the Board’s request, the FBI indicated they were unable to identify with an arrest record pertaining to the applicant on the basis of information furnished (Exhibit D).
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01770
---, which is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that the applicant provided no facts warranting an upgrade of his discharge. Exhibit B. LAWRENCE R. LEEHY Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-01770 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01255
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 3 February 1951, the former member enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age of 18 in the grade of airman basic (E-1) for a period of four (4) years. On 12 December 1955, the former member submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFRDB) requesting his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03458
A special court-martial was convened on 4 June 1954 in Wilmington to address the applicant’s two outstanding AWOL charges, 1 December through 12 March 1954 and 23 through 29 March 1954, where the applicant was found guilty and consequently sentenced to confinement with hard labor for six months and fined $34 per month for six months. The sentence was disapproved and the charges dismissed as the HQ Eastern Defense Force commander found that the applicant had, in fact, been discharged from...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00762
DPPRS states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, and the discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 8 September 2005 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Michael J. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02357
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02357 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded. He received 14 days’ restriction. After careful consideration of the applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we see no evidence that would warrant...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01465
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01465 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 29 October 1953, the discharge authority approved the separation recommended by the Board of Officers and directed that applicant be discharged with an undesirable discharge. ...