Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200220
Original file (0200220.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-00220
            INDEX CODE:  107.00

      APPLICANT  COUNSEL:  None

      SSN   HEARING DESIRED:  Yes

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Republic of
Vietnam Campaign Medal.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The reasons the applicant believes the  records  to  be  in  error  or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support  of  the  appeal  are  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from  the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared  by
the appropriate office of the Air Force.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPPR states the applicant has not submitted any documentation
to substantiate that he was an aircrew member or that he flew  in  any
combat mission or had any  direct  involvement  with  any  mission  in
support  of  Vietnam.    DPPPR   requested   the   applicant   provide
documentation to  support  his  request,  he  did  not  respond.   The
Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal is awarded for six months  of  duty
in Vietnam, there is nothing in the applicant's records to indicate he
was stationed, TDY or participated in any mission in direct support of
operations in Vietnam.  The applicant stated he was TDY  in  Guam  for
six months not Vietnam.  The applicant is not eligible to receive  the
Republic  of  Vietnam  Campaign  Medal.   Therefore,  based   on   the
information provided they recommend denying the requested relief.

A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant on 26 April 2002, for review and response.  As of this date,
no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed; however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice  for  award  of  the  Republic  of
Vietnam Campaign Medal.  The applicant's records do not  reflect  that
he was stationed, TDY or  involved  in  any  missions  in  support  of
Vietnam.  The applicant has not provided any documentation to  support
his request.  Applicant’s contentions  are  duly  noted;  however,  we
agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force  and  adopt
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an  error  or  injustice.   Therefore,  in  the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no  compelling  basis  to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
00220 in Executive Session on June 4, 2002 under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:

                 Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
                 Mr. Christopher Carey, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 Oct 01, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 22 Apr 02.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Apr 02.




                                   VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200042

    Original file (0200042.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00042 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect medals for service while on temporary duty (TDY) to Takhli, Thailand. Unfortunately, the applicant’s records do not reflect that he was deployed to Thailand in direct support of operations in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03352

    Original file (BC-2002-03352.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he served temporary duty tours in Guam, Vietnam and Okinawa. We thoroughly reviewed the applicant's submission and the available evidence of record and do not find evidence which would lead us to believe that he meets the requirements for award of the VSM. Should he secure supporting documentation to show that he meets the requirements for award of the VSM, the Board would reconsider his application.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201136

    Original file (0201136.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01136 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and credit for time served in Cuba [Cuban Missile Crisis (24 Oct 62 – 1 Jun 63)]. He...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200531

    Original file (0200531.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's available military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and submitted previously received documentation to support his request for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200826

    Original file (0200826.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00826 INDEX CODE 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from the Armed Forces, be amended to reflect service in Vietnam. His final destination was Bien Hoa Air Base, Republic of Vietnam, another classified mission, where he provided...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00391

    Original file (BC-2003-00391.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award and the Air Force Longevity Service Award. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not persuaded that his uncorroborated assertions, in and by themselves, are sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air Force. The applicant was unable to provide the necessary evidence to verify his eligibility for award of the AFEM or that he served as an enlisted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0001810A

    Original file (0001810A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01810 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests additional credit for his foreign service and that he be awarded the following decorations: Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Combat “V” Device, the Vietnam Service and Campaign...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01458

    Original file (BC-2003-01458.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01458 INDEX CODE: 113.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: Michael C. Stevenson XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect service time in the Philippines and Vietnam and he be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) or Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00645

    Original file (BC-2003-00645.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is entitled to the Army of Occupation of Japan Medal for serving in Jama Taichkaw, Japan and the National Defense Service medal for serving in the military from 12 August 1948 through 21 July 1952. Should the applicant secure documentation showing the location and dates of his overseas assisgnment in Japan, the Board would reconsider his application. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 20 May 03,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802698

    Original file (9802698.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Awards and Decorations Section, Promotion, Evaluation, & Recognition Division, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, reviewed this application and states that without documentation showing the applicant actually accomplished the TDY to Saudi Arabia during January through May 1994, they can not verify his eligibility for the SWASM with 1 Bronze Service Star. Exhibit B. VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ Panel Chair AFBCMR...