RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00254
INDEX NUMBER: 110.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reentry (RE) Code be changed from a “2” to a “1.”
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust
and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant’s military records, are contained in the memorandums prepared
by the appropriate offices of the Air Force.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and recommended
denial. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPRS determined that based on the documentation in the
applicant’s file, his discharge was consistent with the procedural and
substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The complete
evaluation is at Exhibit D.
AFPC/DPPAE determined that the applicant’s RE code of “2C”
“involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level
separation with an honorable discharge is correct.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to the applicant on
28 Jun 02 for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response
has not been received.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we
agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of
primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-00254 in
Executive Session on 21 August 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Panel Chair
Mr. Mike Novel, Member
Ms. Marilyn Thomas, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Jan 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, BCMR Medical Consultant,
dated 11 Mar 02.
Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 4 Apr 02.
Exhibit E. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 19 Jun 02.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 28 Jun 02.
LAWRENCE R. LEEHY
Panel Chair
The applicant was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder and personality disorder unsuiting for continued military service. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 28 June 2002 for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however,...
He was given a Reentry Code of “2Q,” “personnel medically retired or discharged” and a Separation Code of “JFL,” “involuntary discharge directed by established directive (No entitlements) for a physical disability which existed prior to entry on active duty, during a break in service, or during a period of inactive service, and was established by a physical evaluation board.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the evaluations prepared by the...
The commander advised the applicant that if his recommendation was approved, his discharge would be described as an uncharacterized entry-level discharge and he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation at the time of his discharge from active duty. A...
He would not have enlisted in the Air Force if not for the guarantee he received from the recruiter. On 22 June 1998, he signed a statement indicating he was a homosexual and he requested he be discharged from the Air Force for homosexual conduct. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states that RE code 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” is correct.
The evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE recommended denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
As a result, you were disenrolled from the Security Forces technical training course on 18 October 2001. However, after reviewing the applicant’s request and the evidence of record, we find the narrative reason for his entry level separation; i.e., entry level performance and conduct, to be inaccurate. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...
He presented to VA in 1997, was evaluated and initially rated at 10% for Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) that was judged to be service connected due to the history of anxiety documented in his service medical record. An examination of the applicant’s medical records shows that he was treated for various medical conditions throughout his military career; however, none were considered severe or grave enough that a medical evaluation conducted for the purpose of his ongoing discharge...
The applicant should not have been allowed to enlist in the Air Force with asthma. Other relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and recommended denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03381 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, be corrected as follows: Block 6 should read 5 August 1999 and Block 26 should read LCC. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01253 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded to honorable. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt their rationale as the...