___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s counsel, Division of Veterans Affairs (DVA), states that the applicant’s personnel file shows no indication that the orders in question were changed, countermanded, or disobeyed nor that the applicant served anywhere in the Air Force during the time period other than Leopoldville, Congo as ordered. ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00004 INDEX CODE: A50.00, A50.03 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00005 INDEX CODE: 110.00 xxxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE xxxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. We considered applicant’s request for an honorable discharge; however, based on his overall record we do not...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion E. Applicant’s Response DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER RANDOLPH AIR FORCE SAS MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR 31 January 2000 FROM: HQ AFPC/DPPPR 550 C Street West Ste 12 Randolph AFB TX 78150-4714 SUBJECT:...
On 21 Mar 2000, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s request for upgrade of his discharge to honorable and change of his RE code. A copy of the AFDRB Hearing record is attached at Exhibit C. The AFDRB Hearing Record was forwarded to applicant for review and response (Exhibit D.). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPRS, dtd 17 February 2000 17 February 2000 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPC/DPPRS 550 C Street West Ste 11 Randolph AFB TX 78150-4713 SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records - The applicant, while serving in the grade of airman basic, was discharged from the Air Force on 22 Apr 58 as a result of court-martial conviction and received an under other than honorable conditions discharge. He is requesting an upgrade of his discharge to under...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
His reduction in grade was suspended until 10 Dec 96, "after which time it would be remitted without further action unless sooner vacated." The evidence of record indicates that the applicant received nonjudicial punishment under Article 15 for adultery. Subsequently, the successor of the commander who imposed the Article 15 punishment vacated the suspended reduction based on the applicant’s failure to obey a lawful order from the acting commander.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00020 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show that his disability was incurred in the line of duty and caused by an instrumentality of war. The applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. The applicant’s medical condition at the time of his initial disability discharge and his succeeding disability retirement does not...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AFBCMR 00-00023 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for correction of Military Records and under the authority of section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (707A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to XXXXXXXXXX., XXX-XX-XXXX, be corrected to show that: a. The Officer Selection Brief viewed by the CY97B JAG Colonel Selection Board be, and hereby is,...
A member who elects to serve an unaccompanied tour in lieu of an accompanied tour at a permanent station where the member's dependents are pern1itted is not entitled to FSA unless waived by the Service Secretary The waiver authority is prospective only and is limited to situations in which it would be inequitable to deny the allowance to the member because of unusual family or operational circumstances. However, because the waiver authority is prospective only, he could not be paid FSA for...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
INDEX CODE: 131.09 AFBCMR 00-00030 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
His recommendation was based on the fact that the applicant was not disabled for performance of his military duties up the day he retired, which is the sole criterion for evaluation in the disability system. A complete copy of this evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 21 Apr 00 for review and response within 30 days. ...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
AFBCMR 00-00046 INDEX NUMBER: 137.04 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The applicant successfully pointed out to the reviewer in his rebuttal that the period covered by the referral report was incorrect and that he was due a change of reporting official (CRO) report closing out 3 March 1996. The additional rater requested and received a waiver for a report to be rendered on the applicant with only 110 days of supervision. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AF/DPRCC, dtd 5 Feb 00, w/atchs 5 February 2000 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: AF/DPRCC SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records -See Attached Roster This responds to your request for a BCMR advisories on members formerly assigned to Anderson AFB, Guam, who PCS ' d before a correction payment was made restoring a previous COLA reduction. After careful review of COLA rate setting procedures, the Per Diem Committee principals and USD (Personnel and...
Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, ARPC/DPP, dtd Mar 8, 2000 AFBCMR 00-00058 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS stated that, on 15 May 80, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force in the grade of airman (E- 2) under the provisions of AFM 39-12 (Request for Discharge for the Good of the Service) and received an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Her commander recommended she be given an under other than honorable conditions discharge and, on 12 May 80, the...
AFBCMR 00-00072 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: (APPLICANT) Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum...
On 12 March 1998, the applicant was presented an OFFICER/AIRMAN ACTIVE DUTY SERVICE COMMITMENT (ADSC) COUNSELING STATEMENT, AF Form 63, acknowledging that he would incur an eight-year ADSC upon completion of PV4PC (apparently pilot training), but he declined to sign the form. The issue of whether applicant had knowledge of his eight-year commitment becomes muddled because Academy graduates did not sign an AF Form 63 (or any other documentation) specifically setting out the commitment length...
INDEX CODE 113.04 AFBCMR 00-00080 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for upgrade of his discharge (Exhibit C). The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
He was further advised that AFM 39-10 was the governing directive at the time of his discharge. The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
INDEX CODE 128.05 AFBCMR 00-00095 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AFBCMR 00-00096 INDEX CODE: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
AFBCMR 00-00098 INDEX CODE: 110.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
AFBCMR 00-00101 Index Number: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AFBCMR 00-00102 INDEX CODE: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: (APPLICANT) Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum...
The applicant filed his EOT complaint in August 1987, after he was not selected for renewal of his 3-year initial BIMAA tour. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 3 August 2000, under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Dr. Gerald B. Kauvar, Panel Chair Ms. Marcia Bachman, Member Mr. Roger E. Willmeth, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form...
_________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF THE CASE: The applicant’s original application was considered and denied in Executive Session on 3 August 2000 (See AFBCMR 00-00104, with Exhibits A through D). By fax dated 14 August 2000, after having received the Board’s decision, counsel informed the AFBCMR that he had provided a response to the advisory opinion, dated 16 June 2000, which the Board did not have an opportunity to review (Exhibit E). We have...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00105 (Case 2) INDEX CODES: 131.00, 136.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be directly promoted to the grade of lieutenant colonel as though selected by the Calendar Year 1998B (CY98) Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, which convened on 1 Jun 98; or, as an alternative, as an exception to...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant’s Response is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AFBCMR 00-00124 INDEX NUMBER: 135.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: [applicant] Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
AFBCMR 00-00127 INDEX NUMBER: 137.04 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: [APPLICANT] Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00132 INDEX CODE: 108.01, 110.02, 122.01 COUNSEL: Mr. MICHAEL J. CALABRO HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Not In Line of Duty (NLOD) determination be removed from his records; all documents and references pertaining to the NLOD determination be removed from his records; his request for transfer to the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00133 INDEX CODE: 107.00, 131.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 1999A (CY99A) (2 Aug 99) Central Colonel Board with inclusion of his Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), Fifth Oak Leaf Cluster (5OLC), in his officer selection record (OSR). Even though...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit D). The report was forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit F).
AFBCMR 0000148 INDEX CODE: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: (applicant) Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. The twenty-two (22) month extension of her 2 August 1995 enlistment for a period of 4 years, executed on 3 October 1997 and approved on 10 October 1997, be, and hereby is, declared void. At the time of her reenlistment in the Regular Air Force on 16 November 1998...