The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03377 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Blocks 25 (Separation Authority), 26 (Separation Code), and 27 (Reentry Code) be changed to allow him to join the Marine Corps. A complete copy of the Air Force...
2 Since -was authorized dependent travel to the overseas area, his entitlement to FSA and FSH is determined by the reasons for the Early Return of Dependents. ed upon justifiable medical advice, requested his dependents be returned to the TR, Par U5240-D, Return of Dependents from OCONUS Due to Personal Situations. 7A states that entitlement to FSA and FSH does not accrue if are returned for the reasons specified in JFTR, Par U5240-D.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03381 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, be corrected as follows: Block 6 should read 5 August 1999 and Block 26 should read LCC. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
Applicant alleges that PME statements were not included in the contested report and he was not awarded a medal because of reprisal against him. He was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) for service performed at the Air Force Academy during the period 26 June 1993 to 7 October 1996. He was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) for service performed at the Air Force Academy during the period 26 June 1993 to 7 October 1996.
However, he has not received the report and the DOD IG has not provided a date when the report will be released. He is requesting that this medal be included for SSB consideration because of the actions of the USAF Academy and the resulting assignment to the SWC. Regarding the applicant’s request that the SWC/AE medal (Air Force Commendation Medal) be included in his records for consideration by the CY98B Lieutenant Colonel Board, it appears that the medal was awarded subsequent to the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03386 INDEX CODE 131.09 131.10 136.01 COUNSEL: Frank J. Spinner HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was not released from active duty on 31 December 1992 but was continued on active duty and considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by any selection board to which he...
A complete copy of the DPPPA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 25 Jan 99 for review and response. In view of the foregoing, and to remove the possibility of an injustice, recommend that the applicant’s records be corrected to reflect award of the MSM. _________________________________________________________________ THE...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03394 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to retire under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) rather than separating under the Special Selection Bonus (SSB). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03395 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to “1A”. The RE code issued at the time of separation was in accordance with the applicable regulations. HENRY ROMO JR. Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-03395 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The following are documented omissions from his personnel records and Officer Selection Brief (OSB) at the time of the CY98B lieutenant colonel board: 1) Overseas Long Tour at Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany: Jan 84- Jan 87. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Reports & Queries Section, HQ AFPC/DPAPS1, states, with respect to the applicant’s duty history, that they have reviewed the applicant’s source document Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) and AF Forms...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Navy Meritorious Unit Citation and AFGCM (1OLC) and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03404 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY98B Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board with the Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 28 February 1998 and the citation for the Defense Meritorious...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RAYMOND H. WELLER Chief Examiner Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03409 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be considered for promotion to the Reserve grade of major by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Fiscal Year 1999 (FY99) Air Force Reserve Major...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03415 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general. The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision. BARBARA A. WESTGATE Panel Chair Exhibits: A.
The first to request promotion consideration to the grade of major, by SSB, because of the DAFSC correction on the two OPRs and, the second to request promotion consideration because of the correction in Section VII of the 15 June 1997 OPR. The Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) was correct on both the Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) reviewed by the CY98B board. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are...
We note that the duty history portion of the CY98 officer selection brief (OSB) correctly indicated the applicant’s duty location as CENTCOM, therefore, the information was available for the promotion board’s review. Additionally, while the citation for the JSAM was not in applicant’s officer selection record (OSR) when the promotion board convened, we note it was listed on the CY98 OSB and a discrepancy report was filed in the OSR; therefore, we must presume the promotion board members had...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Counsel's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-03440 INDEX CODE: 100.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be upgraded. The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AFBCMR 98-03448 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03450 INDEX CODE: 111.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 29 May 1997 through 28 May 1998 be declared void and removed from his records. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states that following separation, the applicant was seen in the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) system where a follow-up x-ray actually showed a healing stress fracture of the left tibial metaphysis and he was awarded 10% disability based on this finding. Had a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) been accomplished with the proper diagnosis (stress fracture of the...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-03455 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES Applicant requests that his reenlistment eligibility be changed from “ineligible” to “eligible” on his NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 14 Dec 98. The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
_________________________________________________________________ DFAS EVALUATION: The Chief, Claims Branch, DFAS-DE/FYCC, reviewed the application and states that they contacted the Waivers and Remission Branch (DFAS- DE/FYCT) for their recommendation and were informed that had the applicant’s remission application been received prior to his separation, they would have recommended remission of $316.65 and denial of $320.00 based on guidelines set forth by the Office of the Secretary of the...
On 1 Dec 97, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service) with an honorable characterization of service in the grade of senior airman with an RE code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel record. Exhibit E. Letter fr applicant,...
His records be corrected to reflect promotion to the grade of major as if selected by the CY96 Major (Chaplain) Board. Therefore, if the Board decides in favor of the applicant and grants promotion reconsideration by the CY96B (17 Jun 96) board, the correction statements will be removed from the copies of the contested OPRs only since the corrections were accomplished after the original board date. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
Applicant states that he does not feel that the award should be treated as an upgrade to the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). _______________________________________________________________________ _____________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that competent authority determined that his actions on 21 August 1965, at Bien Hoa Air Base, Vietnam, merited the award of the Bronze...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response, the applicant stated that, due to an immediate requirement for retainability mandated by a DEROS option selection time requirement, an enlistment extension was unavoidable. Accordingly, we recommend that the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. ROBERT W. ZOOK Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-03473 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s nephew provided a statement, which the applicant signed. We note that HQ AFPC/DPPD disagreed with the Medical Consultant’s recommendation for a 30% disability retirement. However, while he may now have or may ultimately be given a higher disability rating by the DVA, the Air Force disability system stipulates that...
On 20 November 1997, a Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) convened and recommended the applicant be removed from the TDRL. The applicant has not submitted any material or documentation to show he was inappropriately processed under the military disability evaluation system or that he was unfit for continued military duty at the time of his removal from the TDRL. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03493 INDEX NUMBER: 137.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that he be permitted to make an election under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) after the time period to do so expired. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03506 INDEX CODE: 126 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) imposed on 11 December 1997, be set aside and his grade of technical sergeant (E-6) be restored. At any rate, the commander did not have the decision of the city attorney to consider...