DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH
5 Docket No. 10512-08
27 Jul 09
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
“
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 July
2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memo 1133 Ser 32/ of 16 Apr 09,
a copy of which is attached. .
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion, noting that you have a total of 40
acceptable college credits, short of the 48 required for enlistment in
paygrade E-3. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It ig regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that |
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ound
W. DEAN PFE
Executive D
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND
5722 INTEGRITY DR.
MILLINGTON, TN 38054-5057
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1133
Ser 32/
APR 1 6 2009
From: Commander, Navy Recruiting Command
To: Executive Director, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Sub}: BCNR REQUEST 1CcO-NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07567-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. IN REPLY REFER TO: 1133 Ser 32/ AUG 48 2009 From: Commander, Navy Recruiting Command To: Executive Director, Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05383-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00370-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B;OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 370-02 22 Janaury 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive on 22 Janaury 2003. in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory 32/6040 of 8 April 2002, a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10728-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. It is our opinion that in this case the petitioner has a misunderstanding as to how the NCF benefit is calculated.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05465-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. 5465-08 14 Oct 08 Dear
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10738-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11179-07
11179-07 17 Mar 08This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00158-08
158-08 17Mar08This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05170-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01356-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This memorandum updates reference {d).