Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00158-08
Original file (00158-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                             2 NA VY ANNEX
          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


         MEH
                                                                                          Docket No. 158-08
                                                                                 17 Mar 08



This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memo 1133 Ser 32/ of 5 Mar 08, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,

W.       DEAN PFEI FFER
 Executive Di rector




Enclosure





DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND
         5722 INTEGRIT Y DR IVE    
         MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 38054-5057 1133

                                            
                  IN REPLY REFER TO:
                                                                                           Ser 32/
                                                                                                    Mar 05 2008
                                                                                

From:    Commander, Navy Recruiting Command
To:      Executive Director, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Subj:    ECNR REQUEST ICO

Ref:     (a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 1130.8G
End:     (1) BCNR Docket Nr. 00158-08
1.       Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1) . Per reference (a), service member signed a 12 month extension on 6 November, 2006. The Rate of SN (E-3) is listed on this extension agreement which appears to be an error, all other documents in the enlistment kit state E-l as the pay-grade.
2.       This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only. Enclosure (1) is returned.


By direction

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10738-07

    Original file (10738-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11179-07

    Original file (11179-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    11179-07 17 Mar 08This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05465-08

    Original file (05465-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. 5465-08 14 Oct 08 Dear

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07945-08

    Original file (07945-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your alle accordance with mce to your application for correction of your naval o the provisions of 10 USC 1552. nel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, ive session, considered your application on 6 October ations of error and injustice were reviewed in dministrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedin the Board consis submitted in sup statutes, regula the advisory opi a copy of which After careful an the Board found establish the ex this connection, contained in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06621-07

    Original file (06621-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memo 1133 Ser 32/ of 6 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04235-08

    Original file (04235-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10512-09

    Original file (10512-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00370-02

    Original file (00370-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B;OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 370-02 22 Janaury 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive on 22 Janaury 2003. in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory 32/6040 of 8 April 2002, a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02472-02

    Original file (02472-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00870-02

    Original file (00870-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1 133 Ser of which is attached. Enclosure (1) is returned.