Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11179-07
Original file (11179-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
                                                      WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
                                            
                                             MEH
                                                                                 Docket No. 11179-07
                                                                                 17 Mar 08




This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 U sc 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by C NR C memo 1133 Ser 32/ of 5 Mar 08, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely ,


W.       DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Di rector
Enclosure



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND
                                             5722 INTEGRITY DR.
                                                       MILLINCTON, TN 38054-5057

                                    IN REPLY REFER TO:
 1133
 Ser 32/
                                                                                  Mar 05 2008              
                                                                       



From:    Commander, Navy Recruiting Command
To:      Executive Director, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Subj:    BCNR REQUEST ICO

Ref:     (a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 1130.8G
En cl :    (1) BCNR Docket Nr. 11179-07
1.       Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1) Per reference (a) and enclosure (1) It is understandable that the Service members process was time consuming due to medical consults etc. In order to come into the Reserves with out loosing a pay-grade after 6 years of broken service, an elapse time waiver would have had to be completed based on civilian experience in the rate. This waiver was not completed prior to enlistment.
2.       This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only. Enclosure (1) is returned.


By direction

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10738-07

    Original file (10738-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06621-07

    Original file (06621-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memo 1133 Ser 32/ of 6 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00158-08

    Original file (00158-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    158-08 17Mar08This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05465-08

    Original file (05465-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. 5465-08 14 Oct 08 Dear

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00370-02

    Original file (00370-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B;OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 370-02 22 Janaury 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive on 22 Janaury 2003. in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory 32/6040 of 8 April 2002, a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07945-08

    Original file (07945-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your alle accordance with mce to your application for correction of your naval o the provisions of 10 USC 1552. nel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, ive session, considered your application on 6 October ations of error and injustice were reviewed in dministrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedin the Board consis submitted in sup statutes, regula the advisory opi a copy of which After careful an the Board found establish the ex this connection, contained in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08005-07

    Original file (08005-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Upon further review, as provided in enclosure (1), and review of the member official service record_ was attach to the Selected Reserve Component as an SKSN/E3 and did participate in the February 2007 (Cycle 192) advancement examination and was selected for SK3/E4. Therefore, the member is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10512-09

    Original file (10512-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07656-02

    Original file (07656-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Time in rate is always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS returning in a lower paygrade.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07972-02

    Original file (07972-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND 5722 INTEGRITY DR. MILLINGTON. Time in rate is always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS returning in a lower paygrade.