DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON BC 20370-5100
DIC
Docket No. 1356-09
2 July 2009
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
Sitting in executive session, considered your application on
15 June 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/355
dtd 10 Jun 09, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
\ fl
W. DEAN PF
Executive D
Enclosure’
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
S720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
1160.
Ser 811/355
10 Jun 09
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via: PERS-31¢
Subj: BCNR PETITION Ico
Ref: (a) SNM‘'s DD Form 149 dtd 17 Feb 09
(5) OPNAVINST 1160. 8A:
(c) NAVADMIN 240/08
(4) Memorandum for Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval
Records 1160 Ser/242 ‘dtd 22 Apr 09
Enel: (1) BENR File
1. Per references ta) through (c), recommend disapproval to both of
the petitioner's requests. This memorandum updates reference {d).
2. The petitioner ig requesting to be paid SRB in the amount of
$43,493.22, ar to expunge the reenlistment and restore his EAOS/SEAOS.
‘3. The petitioner wad incorrectly teld his SRB was. approved for
$43,492.22 when the GPINS FORMAN SRB inquiry clearly reflects it was
not approved. Reference (c) lowered his SRB award level from 3.5 to
1.5 effective 39 Sep 2008. The petitioner has subsequently FCS
transferred to JReiee Wwith required OBLISERVE to July
2013 and cannot ‘extend the required 25 months due to. already having 25
months of extensions if his EAOS/SEAOS. were restored.
4. tn view of the ahove, recommend the petitioner's record remains as
is. ,
5. ‘this is an advisary mamorandum to’ reference (a} for use by the Board
for Correction of Naval Recerds (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1) is returned.
CG. E. AL STILLLMAN
Division Director
Enlisted Career Progression
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08590-02
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (c), sailor may reenlist anytime within the same fiscal year The petitioner's EAOS is 17 May 2003, which is in the Per In view of the above, recommend the petitioner record remain as 2. is. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05600-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05310-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records ({(BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05862-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference {a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05253-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and , applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05574-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per references (a) through (c), recommend disapprovai to the petitioner’s request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05158-09
7 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Additionally the Enlisted Master File (EMF) does not indicate the petitioner has reenlisted. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05159-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is’ an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05135-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference {a} for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04765-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. ” 5, This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.