DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX .
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH
Docket No. 5383-09
8 Sep 09
Dear
This ls in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8
September 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memo 1133 Ser 32/ of
19 Aug 09, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Enlistment in paygrade E-2 requires a minimum of 24 semester hours or
36 quarter hours. You completed 720 clock hours, which converts to 16
semester hours or 24 quarter hours. This does not meet the
established criteria for paygrade E-2. In this connection, the Board
substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory
opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice. “
Sincerely,
\y!
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Dir
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND
5722 INTEGRITY DR.
MILLINGTON, TN 38054-5057
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1133
Ser 32/
From: Commander, Navy Recruiting Command
To: Executive Director, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Ref: (a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 1130.8H
Enel: (1) BCNR Docket Nr. 05383-09
1. Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1). Per reference {a),
service member does not have the required amount of credits for
advance pay grade to E-2.
2, This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for
Correction of Naval Records only. Enclosure (1) is returned.
2D
E. D. CHENNY
By direction
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01488-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on 28 October 2003. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06764-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1 ’133 Ser attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03844-01
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum which is attached. S. equivalent of 20 semester paygrade E-2. Per enclosure (l), applicant took Per reference (a), This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02861-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02154-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06813-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00115-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04765-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable -statutes, regulations and policies. The criteria for enlistment ina higher (or advanced) paygrade is contained in COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 1130.8H. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01436-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05291-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...