Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07162-09
Original file (07162-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100"
MEH
Docket No. 7162-09
31 Aug O39 ,

 

Dear 4

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August
2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and polictes. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memo 1780 BUPERS-262G of 13
Aug 09, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

It is’ regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is

on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material .

error or injustice,

Sincerely,

a
W. DEAN PRET
Executive Diraéc

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08198-09

    Original file (08198-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application-on | 5 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09699-08

    Original file (09699-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per references {a} through (c), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05018-08

    Original file (05018-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    5018-08 25 Aug 08 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2008. Recommend denial Of Pay request to enroll in th Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) P¥ogram.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05848-03

    Original file (05848-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) listed a zone 'C" SRB entitlement for the MA rate at the time the petitioner received BUPERS order 2402. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04116-98

    Original file (04116-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for AT(OOOO) rate Reference at the time petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9807846

    Original file (NC9807846.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00229-09

    Original file (00229-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by tthe Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, thé burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05582-08

    Original file (05582-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memo 1780 BUPERS-262G of 21 Jul 08, a copy of which is attached. Per reference (b), the decision to disenroll from the MGIB Program is irrevocable.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05886-02

    Original file (05886-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81 is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner reenlisted on 27 February 2002 for two The petitioner signed a NAVPERS years.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07492-08

    Original file (07492-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memo 1780 BUPERS- 262G of 19 Aug 08, a copy of which is attached. Per reference (b), the law governing the MGIB Program, a member must receive an “Honorable” discharge for service to establish entitlement to MGIB benefits.