Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01598-09
Original file (01598-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

bJc

Docket No. 1598-09
9 June 2009

 

Dear 4am

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552,

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

8 June 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/263 dtd 27 Apr
09, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

Tt is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. [In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material -
error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Mop

Executive Dir

Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

 

1369

Ser 811/263
27 Apr O09
MEMORANDUM FOR CHATRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via: PERS-31¢C

 

Subj: BCNR PETITION ICo §

Ref: - (a) SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 3 Nov 08
(b) MILPERSMAN 1160-120

Enci: (1) BCNR File

1. Per references (a) and (b), recommend disapproval to the
petitioner's request.

2. The petitioner is requesting to change his 3 year reenlistment

contract, NAVPERS 1070/601 dated 8 Aug 2007 term to 4 years to receive
SRB.

3. The petitioner was authorized a HYT waiver to reenlist for 3 years
for payback for the HM/8506 NEC *“C” school. The Enlisted Community

Manager (ECM) has denied an additional one year HYT waiver for member
to receive SRB.

4. In view of the above, recommend the petitioner’s record remains as
is.
5. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the

Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR} only. Enclosure (1) is
returned.

? . fT
: a ea 1 |
Cc. E. AIMESTILLMAN ~~
Division Director

Enlisted Career Progression

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03808-09

    Original file (03808-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records {BCNR} only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05135-09

    Original file (05135-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference {a} for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00612-09

    Original file (00612-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01659-09

    Original file (01659-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is en the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per references (a) through (d), recommend disapproval to the petitioner's request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR} only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05600-09

    Original file (05600-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05271-09

    Original file (05271-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10446-08

    Original file (10446-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 5 his is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00062-09

    Original file (00062-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner’s 5 month HYT request to reenlist for 3 year in FY-09 was denied by the member’s Enlisted Community Manager (ECM). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05074-09

    Original file (05074-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04025-09

    Original file (04025-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a} for use by the Board ‘for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.