DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
“ BOARD FOR GORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS .
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
DIC
Docket No. 1659-09
9 June 2009
Dear #
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
8 June 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/253 dtd 24 Apr
09, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
en the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely ,.
W. DEAN PFET
Executive Dikdact
Enclosure
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MLLLINGTON TN 38055-0000
11360
Ser 811/253
24 Apr 09
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF WAVAL RECORDS
‘Via: PERS-31¢
Subj: BCNR PETITION IC@sieanial
Ref: (a) SNM'S DD Form 149 dtd 4 Feb 09
(b) OPNAVINST 1160.8A
(c} NAVADMIN 240/08
(d) MILPERSMAN 1160-120
Encl: (1) BCNR Fiie
1. Per references (a) through (d), recommend disapproval to the
petitioner's request.
2. The petitioner is requesting to expunge his 4 year reenlistment
contract, NAVPERS 1070/601 dated 1 Oct 2008 and affect a new 6 year
reenlistment contract on 15 Mar 2009.
3. The petitioner was an E4 and ineligible to reenlist for 6 years on
his date of reenlistment due to HYT of reference (d). If the
petitioner had been counseled to wait to reenlist on his EAOS so his
24 month extension would not be deducted from his SRB, he was not
eligible for SRB as his award level has been reduced to 0.0. The
petitioner's hindsight is not sufficient grounds to change the
reenlistment date as no error or injustice occurred.
4. In view of the above, recommend the petitioner's record remains as
is.
5S. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR} only. Enclosure (1) is
returned.
£. —
Cc. E. AIM TLLMAN
Division Director zs
, ant
Enlisted Career Progrese ton,
_ a oy
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05600-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01381-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. DEAN ELFFER Executive Director Enclosure ‘ s : i DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND pte at.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04786-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 September 2009. Per references {a} through (d), recommend disapproval to the - petitioner’s request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01598-09
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material - error or injustice. Per references (a) and (b), recommend disapproval to the petitioner's request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR} only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05135-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference {a} for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05127-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05158-09
7 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Additionally the Enlisted Master File (EMF) does not indicate the petitioner has reenlisted. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05189-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01357-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR} only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05159-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is’ an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.