DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
DIC
Docket No. 612-09
9 June 2009
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
8 June 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/122 dtd 25 Mar
09, a copy. of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to alli official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
- MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
11606
Ser 811/122
25 Mar 09
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via: PERS-31¢C
Subj: BCNR PETITION ICcO.si
Ref: (a) SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 3 Nov 08
(b) MILPERSMAN 1160-120
Fncl: {1} BCNR File
1. Per references (a) and (b), recommend disapproval to the
petitioner’s request.
2. The petitioner is requesting to receive SRB for his reenlistment
contract, NAVPERS 1070/601 dated 8 Aug 07.
3. The petitioner was approved for a 3 year reenlistment which
exceeded HYT of an E3 by 3 years and 3 months. He was not approved
for a 4 year reenlistment or a HYT waiver to be able to receive SRB as
required by reference (b).
4. In view of the above, recommend the petitioner’s record remains as
is.
5. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1) is returned.
C2
Cc. E. AIMESTILL
Division Director
Enlisted Career Progression
5
wes
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10446-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 5 his is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05135-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference {a} for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01659-09
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is en the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per references (a) through (d), recommend disapproval to the petitioner's request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR} only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03808-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records {BCNR} only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05600-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01598-09
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material - error or injustice. Per references (a) and (b), recommend disapproval to the petitioner's request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR} only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05271-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00062-09
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner’s 5 month HYT request to reenlist for 3 year in FY-09 was denied by the member’s Enlisted Community Manager (ECM). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04786-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 September 2009. Per references {a} through (d), recommend disapproval to the - petitioner’s request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04025-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a} for use by the Board ‘for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.