Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00062-09
Original file (00062-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

DUC

Docket No. 62-09
16 June 2009

 

 

Deanne

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel.of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

15 June 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/292
dtd 7 May 09, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material

error or injustice.

Sincerely,

a, BOD ee

Fo._W. DEAN PPELFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

“S720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

1160
Ser 811/292
7 May O09

 

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via: PERS-31¢C

 

Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO i@RQmR

 

Ref: (a) SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 2 Jan 09
(b) OPNAVINST 1160.8A
(c) MILPERSMAN 1160-120

Encl: (1) BCNR File

1. Per references {a) through (c), recommend disapproval to the
petitioner’s request.

2. The petitioner is requesting to expunge his 27 month agreement to
extend enlistment and affect a 3 year reenlistment on 25 Aug 2008 to
receive SRB.

3. The petitioner wag not eligible to reenlist on 25 Aug 2008 since
his FAOS was. 25 Dec 2008 and in a different fiscal year. The
petitioner’s 5 month HYT request to reenlist for 3 year in FY-09 was
denied by the member’s Enlisted Community Manager (ECM).

4. In view of the above, recommend the petitioner’s record remains as
is.

5. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1) is
returned.

Cc. EE. AIMESTILLMAN
Division Director
Enlisted CareeyeProgression

wor iy

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09699-08

    Original file (09699-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per references {a} through (c), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00612-09

    Original file (00612-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01356-09

    Original file (01356-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This memorandum updates reference {d).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03467-09

    Original file (03467-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2009. Per references (a) and (b), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04765-09

    Original file (04765-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. ” 5, This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05135-09

    Original file (05135-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference {a} for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05127-09

    Original file (05127-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05310-09

    Original file (05310-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records ({(BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04786-09

    Original file (04786-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 September 2009. Per references {a} through (d), recommend disapproval to the - petitioner’s request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01787-09

    Original file (01787-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Phis is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.