Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05600-09
Original file (05600-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

DIC

Docket No. 5600-09
22 September 2009

 

Dear

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,.
Sitting in executive session, considered your application on.

21 September 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board |
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/380
dtd 23 Jun 09, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your request for the
Selective Reenlistment bonus has been denied. Furthermore, this
Office did not pursue any further changes per Paragraph 4 of the
attachment; however NPC further recommended instead that your 28
February 2009 reenlistment contract for 5 years be canceled (your 28
February 2009 reenlistment was not transmitted electronically and
therefore it does not appear in the Enlisted Master File), and your
previous EAOS of 28 February 2011 be reinstated. The names and votes
of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Docket No. 5600-09

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material

error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFE
Executive D r

Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

B720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

 

1160

Ser 811/621
22 Sep 09
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via: PERS-31¢C

Subj: BCNR PETITTON Icoeipi

 

Ref: (a} SNM's DD Form 149 @td 22 May 69
= (b) OPNAVINST 1160, 8A
(c) NAVADMIN 006/09
{d) NAVADMIN 240/08
{¢) Memorandum for Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval
Records 1160 Ser 811/380 dtd 23 Jun 09

Encl: (1) BCNR File

l. Per references {a). through (e), recommend an alternate to the
petitioner's request. This memorandum updates reference {e).

2. The petitioner is requesting SRB for his 5 year reenlistment
contract, NAVPERS 1070/601 dated 28 Feb 2009.

3. The petitioner did not have PTS or HYT approval as required prior
to his reenlistment. Additionally in accordance with references (b)
and (¢c), SRB reenlistment requests must be submitted through the
OPINS/FORMAN computer program 35-120 days prior to the requested
reenlistment date. The petitioner’s SRB PRECERT was submitted in
OPINS 31 days after his reenlistment date.

4. In view of the above, recommend expunge the reenlistment contract
which was not transmitted electronically and his 24 month agreement to
extend enlistment remains operative as indicated by the Enlisted
Master File (EMF).

5. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1) is

Division Director
Enlisted Career Progression

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06120-09

    Original file (06120-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. o Sincerely, Executive Enclosure 4 VEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY , NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND - 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 1160 : Ser 811/464 10 Jul 09 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-31C Subj: BCNR PETITION co? This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04786-09

    Original file (04786-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 September 2009. Per references {a} through (d), recommend disapproval to the - petitioner’s request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05862-09

    Original file (05862-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference {a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01381-09

    Original file (01381-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. DEAN ELFFER Executive Director Enclosure ‘ s : i DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND pte at.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05798-09

    Original file (05798-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05253-09

    Original file (05253-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and , applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01357-09

    Original file (01357-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR} only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06661-09

    Original file (06661-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01659-09

    Original file (01659-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is en the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per references (a) through (d), recommend disapproval to the petitioner's request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR} only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00135-09

    Original file (00135-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2009. Per references (a) through (¢), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.