Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10446-08
Original file (10446-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

DIC

Docket No. 10446-08
9 June 2009

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

8 June 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/145 dtd 27 Mar
09, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. .In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. “Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request. °

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Sincerely,

 

Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

"NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

 

1160
Ser 811/145
27 Mar O09

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Via: PERS-31C

 

Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO

Ref: (a) SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 27 Oct 08
(b) MILPERSMAN 1160-120
(c) OPNAVINST 1160.6A

 

Encl: (1) BCNR File

41. Per references (a) through (c}, recommend disapproval to the
petitioner's request.

2. The petitioner is requesting payment of SRB for his reenlistment
on 12 Mar 2004.

3. The petitioner’s SRB request to reenlist for 3 years on 12 Mar
2004 did not take his EAOS into a new zone of SRB eligibility
therefore it was denied. A 4 year reenlistment would have exceeded
the HYT limits of an E3 as specified in reference {b).

4. In view of the above, recommend the petitioner’s record remains as
is.
5 his is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the

Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1) is
returned.

\
C. BE, AIMESTILLMAN
Division Director
Enlisted Career Progression

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11159-07

    Original file (11159-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00612-09

    Original file (00612-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01659-09

    Original file (01659-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is en the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per references (a) through (d), recommend disapproval to the petitioner's request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR} only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04786-09

    Original file (04786-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 September 2009. Per references {a} through (d), recommend disapproval to the - petitioner’s request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05862-09

    Original file (05862-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference {a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05600-09

    Original file (05600-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01598-09

    Original file (01598-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material - error or injustice. Per references (a) and (b), recommend disapproval to the petitioner's request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR} only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03248-07

    Original file (03248-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/285 dtd 1 Jun 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01787-09

    Original file (01787-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Phis is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01356-09

    Original file (01356-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This memorandum updates reference {d).