DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 460-09
14 January 2010 |
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
ons of title 10 of the United
naval record pursuant to the provisi
States Code, section 1552.
oard for Correction of Naval
A three-member panel of the B :
sion, considered your
Records, sitting in executive ses
application on 13 January 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative.
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
oard consisted of
Board. Documentary mat
her with all material submitted in support
your application, toget
d applicable statutes, regulations
‘thereof, your naval record an
and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 25 February
2009, a copy of which is attached. -
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. in this connection the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
s been denied. The names and
Accordingly, your application ha
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
yt case are such that
You are entitled to have the
decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
It is regrette
favorable acti
Board reconsider its
Sincerely,
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03859-09
03859-0939 5 February 2010 ference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States A three-membe Records, sitt application o injustice wer regulations a Code, section 1552. r panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ing in executive session, considered your . Your allegations of error and e reviewed in accordance with administrative nd procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07470-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 28 December 2006, a copy of which is attached, and your rebuttal.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00914-09
8 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 RDZ:ecb Docket No. Your allegations of error and ewed in accordance with administrative cedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in ur naval record and applicable statutes, icies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the |burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06127-02
A three-member p session, considered your injustice were reviewed in to the proceedings of this your application, together opinion furnished by NA copy of which is attached. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ith all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and RUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/6197 of 4 October 2002, a In addition, the Board considered the advisory n of the entire record, the Board found that the cient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06300-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting application on 26 in executive session, considered your February 2009. In addition, the Board considered the furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval 12 August 2008 with enclosures, a copy of which conscientious consideration of the entire found that the evidence submitted was stablish the existence of probable material e. In this connection, the Board substantially e comments contained in the advisory opinion. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08823-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of h all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and your application, together applicable statutes, regulat opinion furnished by NPC which is attached. Consequently, on of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice. The petitioner at 3 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06470-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, application on 26 injustice were re regulations and p Board. Your allegations of error and 1ewed in accordance with administrative ocedures applicable to the proceedings of this y material considered by the Board consisted n, together with all material submitted in our naval record and applicable statutes, licies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00593-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 00593-10 4 October 2010 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 September 2010. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00840-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were so discharged and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code on 13 October 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0529 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100" ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. In addition, the Board on furnished by HoMc memo 7200 RFF-11 dated 9 May 2014, 4 copy of which is attached. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.