8
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
RDZ:ecb
Docket No. 00914-09
4 March 2009
This is in referend
A three-member pan
Records,. Sitting in
application on 3 Ma
injustice were rev
regulations and prd
Board.
support thereof, yd
regulations and pol
advisory opinion,
January 2009, a cof
After careful and qd
record, the Board f
insufficient to est
error or injustice.
concurred with the
Accordingly, your 4
votes of the membenx
request.
It is regretted tha
that favorable acti
the Board reconside
from Headquarters,
e to your application for correction of your
ant to the provisions of title 10 of the
»l of the Board for Correction of Naval
executive session, considered your
rch 2009. Your allegations of error and
ewed in accordance with administrative
cedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted
of your application,
together with all material submitted in
ur naval record and applicable statutes,
icies. In addition, the Board considered the
Marine Corps dated 29
y of which is attached.
onscientious consideration of the entire
ound that the evidence submitted was
ablish the existence of probable material
In this connection, the Board substantially
comments contained in the advisory opinion.
pplication has been denied. The names and
s of the panel will be furnished upon
t the circumstances of your case are such
on cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
x its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence jor other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of vegularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the |burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00648-09
section 1552. , A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 4 May 2009 with attachments and 28 May 2009, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00845-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09105-08
In addition, the Board considered the decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) dated 6 August 2007, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02129-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ~ | application on 4 November 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this | Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01697-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 6 April 2009 with attachments and 10 April 2009 and the Bureau of Naval Personnel dated 13 May 2009, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02440-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, — regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06474-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06410-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01749-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11880-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 1 July 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.