DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
HD :hd
Docket No. 06470-08
26 February 2009
This is in referemce to your application for correction of your
naval record purstant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records,
application on 26
injustice were re
regulations and p
Board. Documenta
of your applicati
support thereof,
regulations and p
advisory opinion
August 2008,
After careful and
record, the Board
Sitting j
in executive session, considered your
February 2009. Your allegations of error and
1ewed in accordance with administrative
ocedures applicable to the proceedings of this
y material considered by the Board consisted
n, together with all material submitted in
our naval record and applicable statutes,
licies. In addition, the Board considered the
urnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 6
a copy of which is attached.
conscientious consideration of the entire
found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the
Accordingly, your
votes of the membs
request.
=
In this connection, the Board substantially
comments contained in the advisory opinion.
application has been denied. The names and
ers of the panel will be furnished upon
=
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence jor other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of yegularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Enclosure
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07751-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 3 September 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06320-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting application on 2 injustice were r regulations and Board. in executive session, considered your February 2009. In addition, the Board considered the furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04173-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2010. of your application, together with all material submitted in-> support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official “naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04021-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2NAVY ANNEX . A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2010. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official “naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04366-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 17 June 2009 with enclosure and the Navy Personnel Command dated 26 June 2009, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00587-09
™ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (PERS-~- 311) dated 26 February 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06300-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting application on 26 in executive session, considered your February 2009. In addition, the Board considered the furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval 12 August 2008 with enclosures, a copy of which conscientious consideration of the entire found that the evidence submitted was stablish the existence of probable material e. In this connection, the Board substantially e comments contained in the advisory opinion. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11551-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1391 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2014. Consequently, when nS applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02535-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2010. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion, but noted PRIMS reflects no BCA conducted on 8 May 2009 (it shows you were medically waived from the BCA conducted on 15 October 2009). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...