This is in referel
naval record purs
United States Cod
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
B
HD:hd
Docket No. 06300-08
26 February 2009
nce to your application for correction of your
pant to the provisions of title 10 of the
eB, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting
application on 26
in executive session, considered your
February 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
support thereof,
regulations and p
advisory opinion
Operations dated
is attached.
After careful and
record, the Board
insufficient to e
error or injustic
concurred with th
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your applicati
on, together with all material submitted in
your naval record and applicable statutes,
blicies. In addition, the Board considered the
furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval
12 August 2008 with enclosures, a copy of which
conscientious consideration of the entire
found that the evidence submitted was
stablish the existence of probable material
e. In this connection, the Board substantially
e comments contained in the advisory opinion.
The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable actlion cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the |burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\Wxook
W. DEAN PFE .
Executive Di or
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06320-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting application on 2 injustice were r regulations and Board. in executive session, considered your February 2009. In addition, the Board considered the furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08727-08
zB three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2010. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 11 February 2009, the advisory opinion from the HOMC Enlisted Promotion Section (MMPR-2), dated 10 June 2009, and the advisory opinion from the HOMC Military Awards Branch (MMMA~3), dated 4 January 2010, copies of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05713-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when) applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06973-08
It is noted that Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) has removed the contested HQMC APS 1650 (EF) from your naval record. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08069-08
You further requested reconsideration for retention in the Navy. It is noted that the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) corrected the PSR as you requested, in August 2008. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2009.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04746-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26| February 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the |burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00845-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12000-08
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 22 January 2009 and 26 February 2009 with enclosures, copies of which are attached. In this regard, the Board noted that the favorable advisory opinion dated 22 January 2009 did not acknowledge the information reflected in enclosures (2), (3), (4) and (9) of the advisory opinion dated 26 February 2009. Reserve Affairs reiterates (as previously stated in the advisory opinion dated 16 May...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06106-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11028-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions from HQMC dated 10 December 2008 with references (b) and (c), 22 January 2009 with enclosures, and 26 February 2009 with enclosure (DD Form 215), copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...