Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06344-06
Original file (06344-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORR CTION F NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHING ON DC 0370-5100

 MEH
Docket No. 6344-06
29 Mar 2007







This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions~ of 0 usc 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, co n side r ed your application on 29 March 2007. Your allegations of e r ror and injustice were in accordance with administrative reg u lations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of our application, together with all material submitted in support the r eof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations a nd po licies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/07u0223 of 8 Mar 07, a copy of w hich is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the e v idence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Bo rd substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisor opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The name and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon reque s t.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to k e ep i n mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all offici a l records . Consequently, when applying for a correction of an offic a 1 naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ex i stence of probable material error or injustice.






Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01938-06

    Original file (01938-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of our application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 06U0739 of 28 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06496-06

    Original file (06496-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6496-06 29 Mar 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 0 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of our application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01378-07

    Original file (01378-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1378-07 19 Apr 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10396-06

    Original file (10396-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10396-06 29 Mar 07This is in reference to your applicant on for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 0 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of our application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11016-06

    Original file (11016-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 07U0l45 of 16 Feb 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00419-07

    Original file (00419-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/07U0l54 OF 16 Feb 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01043-02

    Original file (01043-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Hoard for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2002. Documentary ~iiaterial considered by t lie Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof', your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations antl policies. A review of- master microfiche record indicates he disenrolled from the MGIB Program on 11 June 1990.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07213-06

    Original file (07213-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENTOF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORR CTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 AVY ANNEX WASHING ON DC 20370-5100MEH Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consist d of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulation and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 Nl3ODl/Ser 07U0l25 of 9 Feb 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00156-99

    Original file (00156-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. J * request to remove reference (b) from his officer rence (a) requested an advisory opinion in response to permanent personnel record due to a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10334-06

    Original file (10334-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of our application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 07U0124 of 9 Feb 07, a copy of which s attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...