Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01938-06
Original file (01938-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT 0 THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION F NAVAL RECORDS
2NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 0370-5100


MEH
 Docket No. 1938-06
29 Mar 07







This is in reference to your applicant on for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 0 Usc 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, conside r ed your application on 29 March 2007. Your allegations of e r ror and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative reg u lations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of our application, together with all material submitted in support the r eof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and p olicies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furn is hed by C NO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 06U0739 of 28 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consi d eration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existen ce of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the B o ard substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisor opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The nam e s and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
requ e st.
It is regretted that the circumstance of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. Yo u are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submissi o n of new and material evidence or other matter not previously consid e red by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep n mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official r cords. consequently, when applying for a correction of an offic i al naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the e x istence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely


W.       DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10396-06

    Original file (10396-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10396-06 29 Mar 07This is in reference to your applicant on for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 0 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of our application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06496-06

    Original file (06496-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6496-06 29 Mar 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 0 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of our application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03176-03

    Original file (03176-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your nayal record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by ~eadquarters Marine Corps dated 11 April 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02392-03

    Original file (02392-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects the member's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00229-01

    Original file (00229-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02408-02

    Original file (02408-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2002. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03070-03

    Original file (03070-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. V I R G I N I A 22 134-5 103 ly VgbY REFER TO: MMER/RE R M E W 0 7 2003 Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF F O NAVAL RECORDS MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 1. - service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3C...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02963-03

    Original file (02963-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00579-01

    Original file (00579-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested that your reenlistment code be changed from "RE-3" to "RE-1" (the Marine Corps has neither code). It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has changed your reenlistment code to RE-3C (when directed by CMC or when not eligible and disqualifying factor is not covered by any other code). A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 April 2002.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09807-02

    Original file (09807-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Bocird consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was modified and on 11 January 1973 you received a general discharge by reason of unfitness due to substandard personal behavior. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...