Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11016-06
Original file (11016-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPART ENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR COR ECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHIN TON DC 20370-5100


 MEH
 Docket No. 11016-06
29 Mar 2007








This is in reference to your app l ication for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provision of 10 usc 1552.
A three-member panel of the Boar for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, co n sidered your application on 29 March 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consiste d of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion f urnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 07U0l45 of 16 Feb 07, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious c onsideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the ex i stence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, he Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the ad v isory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
I t is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken You are entitled to have the Board r econsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate he existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,
         




         W. DEAN P F IEFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06344-06

    Original file (06344-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENTOF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORR CTION F NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVYANNEXWASHING ON DC 0370-5100MEH Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of our application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/07u0223 of 8 Mar 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08904-06

    Original file (08904-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORR CTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 AVY ANNEX WASHING ON DC 20370-5100MEH Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion finished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/07U0042 of 23 Jan 07, a co y of which is attached.After careful and conscientious...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02852-06

    Original file (02852-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 06U0648 of 10 Nov 06, and NMPC m ma 7220 Pers-401l of 24 Jan 07, copies of which are attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04748-06

    Original file (04748-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You are entitled to have the Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02509-08

    Original file (02509-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01378-07

    Original file (01378-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1378-07 19 Apr 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10334-06

    Original file (10334-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of our application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 07U0124 of 9 Feb 07, a copy of which s attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09261-06

    Original file (09261-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 3 February 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The fitness report in block 29, does not include time served as a Sales Officer, enclosure (1) has appointment letter as a Helicopter Control officer...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01938-06

    Original file (01938-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of our application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 06U0739 of 28 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01206-08

    Original file (01206-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100JSRDocket No: 1206-0827 March 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.You requested, in effect, that the fitness report for 29 September 2006 to 27 February 2007 be modified by changing the beginning date from 29 September 2006 to 29 August 2006; raising the marks in sections...