Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07213-06
Original file (07213-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORR CTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 AVY ANNEX
WASHING ON DC 20370-5100


 MEH
Docket No. 7213-06
29 Mar 2007









This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions s of 10 Usc 1552.
A three-member panel of the Boa d for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, c o nsidered your application on 29 March 2007. Your allegation of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings o this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consist d of your application, together with all material submitted in suppo r t thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulation and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 Nl3ODl/Ser 07U0l25 of 9 Feb 07, a copy of w hich is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the e x istence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the a dv isory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. T names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon sub m ission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to d eep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all offic i al records. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate he existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,


Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09590-06

    Original file (09590-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE N VYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVA RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 0DJCDocket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished y Memo of 1 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08904-06

    Original file (08904-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORR CTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 AVY ANNEX WASHING ON DC 20370-5100MEH Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion finished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/07U0042 of 23 Jan 07, a co y of which is attached.After careful and conscientious...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01378-07

    Original file (01378-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1378-07 19 Apr 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02852-06

    Original file (02852-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 06U0648 of 10 Nov 06, and NMPC m ma 7220 Pers-401l of 24 Jan 07, copies of which are attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03176-03

    Original file (03176-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your nayal record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by ~eadquarters Marine Corps dated 11 April 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10889-06

    Original file (10889-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted f your application, together with all material submitted in support hereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations a d policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08573-07

    Original file (08573-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    8573-07 29 January 2008DearThis is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06804-06

    Original file (06804-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    06804-06 1 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 March 2007. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnishedby the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 3 October 2006 with enclosure, a copy of which is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02392-03

    Original file (02392-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects the member's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00156-99

    Original file (00156-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. J * request to remove reference (b) from his officer rence (a) requested an advisory opinion in response to permanent personnel record due to a...