Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01043-02
Original file (01043-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E   NAVY 

B O A R D   F O R   C O R R E C T I O N   O F   N A V A L   R E C O R D S  

2 N A V Y   A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

J LP: yr.1 
Docket  No:  1043-02 
18 June  2002 

This  is  in  reference to  your  application  isor correction of  your  nav;d  record  pursuant  to  tlie 
provisions of  title  10 of  the  United  States Code,  section  1552. 

A  three-member panel  of  the  Hoard  for  Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting  in  executive 
session, considered  your application  on  18 June 2002.  Your allegations of  error and  i~ljustice 
were  reviewed  i n  accordance with  administrative regulations antl  ~)rocetlures applicable to  the 
proceetli ngs  of  this  Board.  Documentary  ~iiaterial considered  by  t lie  Board  consisted of  your 
application,  together  with  all  material  submitted  in  support  thereof',  your  naval  record  and 
applicable statutes, regulations antl  policies.  I n  atlclition, tlie  Board  consitleretl  tlie advisory 
opinion  fi~rnislied by  N I T  me~iiorand~~ii 1780 PERS-601 of  29  March  2002, a copy  of  which  is 
attacl~ed. 

After careful and  conscientious consitleration of  tlie  entire record,  the  Board  found that  the 
evidence submitted was  insufficient  to  establish  the  existence of  probable  material  error or 
irijustice.  I n   this  connection,  the  Board  substantially concurred with  tlie comments contained in 
tlie advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your  application  has  been  cienietl.  The names and  votes of 
the  ~iiembers of  tlie  panel  will  be  furnished  upon  request. 

It  is  regretted  that  the  circumstances of  your  case  are  such  that  favorable action  cannot be  taken. 
You  are entitled  to  have  the  Board  reconsider its decision  upon  si~b~nission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other  tilatter not  previously  consiclered  by  the  Board.  In  this  regard,  i t   is  important 
to  keep  in  mind  that  a presuniption  of  regularity attaches to all  official  records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official  naval  record,  the  burden  is  on  the applicant to 
den~onstrate the existence of  probable  material  error or  injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN  PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 

5720 INTEGRITY  DRIVE 

MILLINGTON T N  38055-0000 

1780 
PERS-604 
29  Mar  02 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Via : 

Assistant  for BCNR Matters  (PERS-OOZCB) 

Subj:  REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS  ICO 

(a) CNPC memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 26 Mar 02 
(b) Title 38, United States Code, Chapter 30 

The following is provided in response to reference  (a): 

a.  Recommend denial o 

request to enroll in 

the Montgomery GI Bill  (MGIB) Program.  A review of- 
master microfiche record indicates he disenrolled  from the MGIB 
Program on 11 June 1990.  Per reference  (b), the decision to 
disenroll is irrevocable. 

ase has been reviewed.  Without a 

statement from the briefing official, miscounseling cannot be 

documented.  If 7 can provide documentat ion from the 

briefing official w ere the alleged miscounseling occurred 
stating he provided incorrect information during his brief, a 
more favorable recommendation could be gjven. 

2.  PERS-604's point of contact i 
reached at  (DSN) 882-4245 or  (C) 

who can be 

Branch  (PERS-604) 

ucation Programs 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06323-01

    Original file (06323-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. Docu~nentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. If briefing official where the alleged miscounseling occurred stating he provided incorrect information during his brief, a more favorable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07599-01

    Original file (07599-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material subniitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The following is provided in response to reference (a): b. J s case has been reviewed.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02189-02

    Original file (02189-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP: yri ~ o c k e ; No: 2 189-02 19 June 2002 From: Chairn~an, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: ( 1 ) DD Form 149 w/attacli~nents (2) NPC memo 1780 PERS-604 of 17 May 2002 (3) Subject's naval record I. Pursirant to the provisions of reference (a), Su1,ject...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02116-02

    Original file (02116-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 J LI': yr.1 Docket No: 2 1 16-02 19 June 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD - Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject Ilereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03316-01

    Original file (03316-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Docirlnentary ~iiaterial considered by the Boartl consisted of your application, together with all tilaterial submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Recommend the Board deny -s request to enroll In the Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). b. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to enroll or decline enrollment in VEAP.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01265-01

    Original file (01265-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on IO October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 PERS 604 of 3 April 2001, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07937-01

    Original file (07937-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandu~n 1780 Pers 604 of l l January 2002, a copy of which is attached. c. Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01943-01

    Original file (01943-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 September 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1780 PERS 604 of 12 June 2001, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07306-01

    Original file (07306-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-niember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to enroll or decline enrollment in VEAP. Members who initially entered active duty during the VEAP era were not eligible for MGIB Program enrollment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03740-01

    Original file (03740-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 3740-01 10 October 200 1 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, section 1552. on 10 October 200 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative...