Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02416-03
Original file (02416-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

BOARD  FOR  CORRECTION OF  NAVAL  RECORDS 

2  NAVY  ANNEX 

W A S H I N G T O N   DC  2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

CRS I 
Docl-:et No:  2416-03 
7 MRV  2003 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your 
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 1 Q   of the United 
States Code, section 1552. 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval 
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your 
application on 7 May  2003.  Your allegations of error and 
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative 
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this 
Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of 
your application, together with all material submitted in support 
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations 
and policies.  In addition, the Board considered the agvisory 
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 7 March 
2003, a copy of which is attached. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire 
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted wa$ 
insufficient to establish the existence of probab1.e material 
error or injustice.  In this connection, the Board substantially 
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. 
Accordingly, your application has been denied.  The names and 
votes of the members of the panel will be furnish~d upon request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that 
favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have the 
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. 
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a 
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. 

Consequently, when applying for a correction of dn official naval 
record, the burden  is on the applicant to demonstrate the 
existence of probable material  error or  injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN PFEIFPER 
~ x e c u t i v e  Director 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT O F  THE  NAVY 

HCADQUARTERS  UNITCD STATES  M A R I N E  CORPS 
~ ~ ~ O R ~ ~ S ~ L L R O A D  

QUANTICO,  VIRGINIA  PP 1 3 4 - 8  1 0 3  

I N  REPLY R E F E R  TO: 
1040 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

I 

Subj:  BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF FORMER LAN%  CORPORAL 0 SUBJ: RECOE 7 

Encl:  (1)  M~.-DD 

Form 149 of 16 Nov 200 
I 

.

 

r

service record has been reviewed bnd it has been 

1.  ~
determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3P was correctly 
assigned.  The reenlistment code was assigned based on his 
overall record and means that he did not meet the physical/ 
medical standards for reenlistment at the time of separation. 

2.  - w a s  
of Weight Control Failure.  A review of his servi,.:e record book 
indicates that he was counseled concerning not being recommended 
for promotion, and failure to meet height and weiaht standards. 

honorably discharged on May 28  1998 by reason 

3.  After a review of all relevant information, t  s Headquarters 
concurs in the professional evaluation of Mr. -qualifi- 
cations for reenlistment at the time of separatio~:. Once a code 
is correctly assigned it is not routinely changed or upgraded as 
a result of events that occur after separation or based merely 
on the passage of time. 

4.  The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine C*orps is an 
administrative marking which reflects the member's  acceptability 
for reenlistment at the time of separation from the Marine 
Corps.  The code may, however, be waived at the di,scretion of 
the acquiring branch of service per their own policies and 
regulations. 

5.  The enclosure is returned for final action. 

Head, Perrormance Evaluation 
Review Branch 
Personnel Management Division 
By direction of the Commandant 
of the Marine Corps 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02963-03

    Original file (02963-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02041-03

    Original file (02041-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects the member's acceptability for reenlistment at the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03070-03

    Original file (03070-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. V I R G I N I A 22 134-5 103 ly VgbY REFER TO: MMER/RE R M E W 0 7 2003 Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF F O NAVAL RECORDS MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 1. - service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3C...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00889-03

    Original file (00889-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects the member's acceptability for reenlistment at the time...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02392-03

    Original file (02392-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects the member's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02345-03

    Original file (02345-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Bo?.rd consisted of in support your application, together with all material submrtted thereof, your naval record and applicable statuteg, regulations and policies. ~t a records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of r i n official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice1 Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIF: ~ x e c u t i v e D i m Enclosure I ) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03074-03

    Original file (03074-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Doc ,et No: 3074-03 7 M a v 2003 This is in reference to your application for corr'ectlon of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title States Code, section 1552. of the United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03176-03

    Original file (03176-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your nayal record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by ~eadquarters Marine Corps dated 11 April 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00662-03

    Original file (00662-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02029-03

    Original file (02029-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 3 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. concurs in the professional evaluation of - qualifi- cations for reenlistment at the time of separation.