DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0
CRS
Docket No: 2392-03
29 May 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
\
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 29 May 2003. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 5 March
2003, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
v o t ~ s of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
D E P A R T M E N T O P T H E N A V Y
'
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
SPIO R u r s r u ROAD
QUANTICO, VIROINIA aa 1 ad-8 10s
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1040
MMER/RE
MAR 0 5 2003
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF FORMER 0%
Encl: (1) ' DD Form 149 of 23 Oct 2002
SUBJ: RECOD
record has been reviewed and it has been
was honorably discharged on January 31, 1997 by
1. -service
determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3P was correctly
assigned. The reenlistment code was assigned based on his
overall record and means that he did not meet the physical/
medical standards for reenlistment at the time of separation.
2 .-
reason of Disability. A review of his service record indicates
that he was counseled concerning lack of initiative, displays of
poor judgment, inability to speak tactfully to noncommissioned
officers, unauthorized absence, failure to obey orders,
travelling out of established boundaries, lack of leadership
skills, and not being recommended for promotion. It is also
noted that a medical board determined that.-suffered
from Infragatellar Tendonitis, Medial Meniscius Tear, and
Patellofemoral Syndrome which rendered him unfit for duty.
3. After a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters
concurs in the professional evaluation of
fications for reenlistment at the time of-nce
code is correctly assigned it is not routinely changed or
~ ; y ~ r a d ~ d
based merely on the passage of time.
as a result of events that occur after separation or
quali-
a
4. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an
administrative marking which reflects the member's acceptability
for reenlistment at the time of separation from the Marine Corps.
The code may, however, be waived at the discretion of the
acquiring branch of service per their own policies and
regulations.
5. The enclosure is returned for final action.
Head, ~krformance valuation
Review Branch
Personnel Management Division
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02041-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects the member's acceptability for reenlistment at the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00860-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code was assigned based on his overall record and means that he was not recommended for reenlistment at the time of separation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05747-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 5747-03 20 August 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02029-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 3 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. concurs in the professional evaluation of - qualifi- cations for reenlistment at the time of separation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02328-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 11 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02345-03
Documentary material considered by the Bo?.rd consisted of in support your application, together with all material submrtted thereof, your naval record and applicable statuteg, regulations and policies. ~t a records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of r i n official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice1 Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIF: ~ x e c u t i v e D i m Enclosure I ) .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05894-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2003. 'service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3F was correctly assigned. It is also noted that on March 22, 1994 he signed an official service record book entry acknowledging assignment of the RE-3F reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02090-03
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 5 March 2003, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02963-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03364-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2003. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 16 February 1996 you received 'a general discharge by reason of llinvoluntary discharge directed by established directive^.^^ At that time, you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4. The reenlistment code was assigned based on his overall record and...