Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02392-03
Original file (02392-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

BOARD  FOR  C O R R E C T I O N  OF  NAVAL  RECORDS 

2  NAVY  ANNEX 

WASHINGTON  D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

CRS 
Docket No:  2392-03 
29 May 2003 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your 
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United 
States Code, section 1552. 

\ 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval 
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your 
application on 29 May  2003.  Your allegations of error and 
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative 
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this 
Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of 
your application, together with all material submitted in support 
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations 
and policies.  In addition, the Board considered the advisory 
opinion furnished by  Headquarters Marine Corps dated 5 March 
2003,  a copy of which is attached. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire 
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was 
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material 
error or injustice.  In this connection, the Board substantially 
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. 
Accordingly, your application has been denied.  The names and 
v o t ~ s  of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that 
favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have the 
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. 
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a 
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. 

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval 
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the 
existence of probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

D E P A R T M E N T O P T H E N A V Y  

' 

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 

SPIO R u r s r u  ROAD 

QUANTICO,  VIROINIA  aa 1 ad-8 10s 

IN REPLY REFER TO: 
1040 
MMER/RE 
MAR  0  5 2003 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Subj:  BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF FORMER 0% 

Encl:  (1) ' DD Form 149 of 23 Oct 2002 

SUBJ: RECOD 

record has been reviewed and it has been 

was honorably discharged on January 31, 1997 by 

1. -service 
determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3P was correctly 
assigned.  The reenlistment code was assigned based on his 
overall record and means that he did not meet the physical/ 
medical standards for reenlistment at the time of separation. 
2 .- 
reason of Disability.  A review of his service record indicates 
that he was counseled concerning lack of initiative, displays of 
poor judgment, inability to speak tactfully to noncommissioned 
officers, unauthorized absence, failure to obey orders, 
travelling out of established boundaries, lack of leadership 
skills, and not being recommended for promotion.  It is also 
noted that a medical board determined that.-suffered 
from Infragatellar Tendonitis, Medial Meniscius Tear, and 
Patellofemoral Syndrome which rendered him unfit for duty. 

3.  After a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters 
concurs in the professional evaluation of 
fications for reenlistment at the time of-nce 
code is correctly assigned it is not routinely changed or 
~ ; y ~ r a d ~ d  
based merely on the passage of time. 

as a result of events that occur after separation or 

quali- 

a 

4.  The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an 
administrative marking which reflects the member's  acceptability 
for reenlistment at the time of separation from the Marine Corps. 
The code may, however, be waived at the discretion of the 
acquiring branch of service per their own policies and 
regulations. 

5.  The enclosure is returned for final action. 

Head, ~krformance  valuation 
Review Branch 
Personnel Management Division 
By direction of the Commandant 
of the Marine Corps 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02041-03

    Original file (02041-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects the member's acceptability for reenlistment at the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00860-03

    Original file (00860-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code was assigned based on his overall record and means that he was not recommended for reenlistment at the time of separation.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05747-03

    Original file (05747-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 5747-03 20 August 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02029-03

    Original file (02029-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 3 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. concurs in the professional evaluation of - qualifi- cations for reenlistment at the time of separation.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02328-03

    Original file (02328-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 11 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02345-03

    Original file (02345-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Bo?.rd consisted of in support your application, together with all material submrtted thereof, your naval record and applicable statuteg, regulations and policies. ~t a records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of r i n official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice1 Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIF: ~ x e c u t i v e D i m Enclosure I ) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05894-03

    Original file (05894-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2003. 'service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3F was correctly assigned. It is also noted that on March 22, 1994 he signed an official service record book entry acknowledging assignment of the RE-3F reenlistment code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02090-03

    Original file (02090-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 5 March 2003, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02963-03

    Original file (02963-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03364-03

    Original file (03364-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2003. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 16 February 1996 you received 'a general discharge by reason of llinvoluntary discharge directed by established directive^.^^ At that time, you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4. The reenlistment code was assigned based on his overall record and...