DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S
2 N A V Y A N N E X
W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0
CRS
Docket No: 2029-03
24 April 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 23 April 2003. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 3 March
2003, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
~ccordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously .considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y
HLADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINS CORPS
3PbORUSSELLROAD
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1040
QUANTICO. VIRGINIA P P 1 a4.5 f 03
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF FORMER- - SUBJ: RECODE
Form 149 of 28 Oct 2001
NAVAL RECORDS
Encl: (1) -DD
1. -service
been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-4 was correctly
assigned. The reenlistment code was assigned based on his
overa1.l record and means that he was not recommended for
reenlistment at the time of separation.
record has been reviewed and it has
was honorably discharged on January 3, 1995 by
2.
reason of Completion of Required Obligated Service. A review of
the administrative portion of his service record indicates that
he was counseled concerning a lack of self-discipline, pride,
bearing and endurance, repeatedly failing the guard examination,
being relieved of all duties concerning the Guard, lack of
leadership and knowledge, indebtedness to Marines junior to him
and under his supervision, falling out of unit PT runs, lack of
integrity, failing to conduct himself properly, not being
recomrr~ended for promotion, frequent involvement with military
authorities, and not being recommended for reenlistment. The
disciplinary portion of the record shows that he received one
Summary Court-Martial and one nonjudicial punishment under the
Uniform Code of Military Justice for offenses which included
making and uttering worthless checks, wearing unauthorized
ribbons on his uniform, and willfully and unlawfully altering
public records. It is also noted that on December 12, 1994, he
signed an official service record book entry acknowledging
assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.
concurs in the professional evaluation of - qualifi-
cations for reenlistment at the time of separation. Once a code
is correctly assigned it is not routinely changed or upgraded as
a result of events that occur after separation or based merely on
the passage of time.
3. After a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters
4. The enclosure is returned for final action.
.- A - -..,.-=..L*
Head, Performance Evaluation
Review Branch
Personnel Management Division
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00860-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code was assigned based on his overall record and means that he was not recommended for reenlistment at the time of separation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02041-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects the member's acceptability for reenlistment at the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02392-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects the member's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02345-03
Documentary material considered by the Bo?.rd consisted of in support your application, together with all material submrtted thereof, your naval record and applicable statuteg, regulations and policies. ~t a records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of r i n official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice1 Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIF: ~ x e c u t i v e D i m Enclosure I ) .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05894-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2003. 'service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3F was correctly assigned. It is also noted that on March 22, 1994 he signed an official service record book entry acknowledging assignment of the RE-3F reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02090-03
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 5 March 2003, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05747-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 5747-03 20 August 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03176-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your nayal record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by ~eadquarters Marine Corps dated 11 April 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03070-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. V I R G I N I A 22 134-5 103 ly VgbY REFER TO: MMER/RE R M E W 0 7 2003 Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF F O NAVAL RECORDS MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 1. - service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3C...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00662-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...