Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03074-03
Original file (03074-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT  OF THE  NAVY 

BOARD  FOR  CORRECTION  OF  NAVAL  RECORDS 

2  NAVY  ANNEX 

WASHINGTON  DC  20370-5100 

CRS 
Doc ,et No:  3074-03 

7  M a v 2003 

This is in reference to your application for corr'ectlon of your 
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 
States Code, section 1552. 

of the United 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval 
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your 
application on 7 May  2003.  Your allegations of error and 
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative 
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this 
Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of 
your application, together with all material submitted in support 
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations 
and policies.  In addition, the Board considered the advisory 
opinion furnished by  Headquarters Marine Corps dated 7 April 
2003, a copy of which is attached, and your rebut+-a1 to the 
opinion. 

After careful and conscientious consideration or  rne entire 
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was 
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material 
error or injustice.  In this connection, the Board substantially 
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. 
Accordingly, your application has been denied.  The names and 
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that 
favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have the 
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. 
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a 
presumption of regularity attaches to all officia'  records. 

Consequently, when applying  for a  correction of  an official naval 
record,  the burden  is on the applicant to demons,:rate the 
existence of probable material  error or  injusticr 

Sincerely, 

I 

Enclosure 

i 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

H E A D Q U A R T E R S   U N I T E D  STATES  M A R I N E  C O R P S  

3280 R U S S E L L  R O A D  

Q U A N T I C O .   V I R G I N I A   2 2 1 3 4 - 5  1 0 3  

IN REPLY REFER TO: 

1040 
MMER/.RE 
Af%  0 7  2003 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR 

NAVAL RECORDS 

OF 

ER LANCE CORPORAL 

SUBJ:  RECODE 

Encl:  (1) 

DD Form 149 of 17 Mar 2003 

1.  ~r.-service 
been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-4 was correctly 
assigned.  The reenlistment code was assigned based on his 
overall record and means that he was not recommended for 
reenlistment at the time of separation. 

record has been reviewed and it has 

A 

2.  Mr.-was 
honorably discharged on November 16; 2001 by 
reason  f Secretarial Authority.  A review of his service record 

Mr & abused over-the-counter medications resulting in two 

incidents of deliberate overdosing, which requireld emergency 
medical treatment. 

3.  After a review of all relevant information, ~111s Headquarters 
concurs in the professional evaluation of M-qualifi- 
cations for reenlistment at the time of separation.  Once a code 
is correctly assigned it is not routinely changed or. upgraded as 
a result of events that occur after separation or based merely 
on the passage of time. 

4.  The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine ~ o r p s  is an 
x  administrative marking which reflects the member's acceptability 
for reenlistment at t h ~  time of separation from tile Marine C o l - p s .  
The code may, however, be waived at the discretion of the 
acquiring branch of service per their own policies and 
regulations. 

5.  The enclosure is returned for final action.' 

Head, Ferformance  valuation 
Review Branch 
Personnel Manageme t Division 
By direction of th  Commandant 
of the Marine Corp 

'I f 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03070-03

    Original file (03070-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. V I R G I N I A 22 134-5 103 ly VgbY REFER TO: MMER/RE R M E W 0 7 2003 Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF F O NAVAL RECORDS MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 1. - service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3C...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05747-03

    Original file (05747-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 5747-03 20 August 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03176-03

    Original file (03176-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your nayal record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by ~eadquarters Marine Corps dated 11 April 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05894-03

    Original file (05894-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2003. 'service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3F was correctly assigned. It is also noted that on March 22, 1994 he signed an official service record book entry acknowledging assignment of the RE-3F reenlistment code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02963-03

    Original file (02963-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00889-03

    Original file (00889-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects the member's acceptability for reenlistment at the time...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03072-03

    Original file (03072-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 8 April 2003, a copy of which is attached. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03364-03

    Original file (03364-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2003. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 16 February 1996 you received 'a general discharge by reason of llinvoluntary discharge directed by established directive^.^^ At that time, you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4. The reenlistment code was assigned based on his overall record and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05745-03

    Original file (05745-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02773-03

    Original file (02773-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 28 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative...