Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03070-03
Original file (03070-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

B O A R D   F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F   NAVAL  R E C O R D S  

2  NAVY  ANNEX 

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1  0 0  

CRS 
Docket No:  3070-03 
14 May  2003 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your 
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the united 
States Code, section 1552. 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval 
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your 
application on 14 May 2003.  Your allegations of error and 
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative 
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this 
Board.  Documentary material considered by  the Board consisted of 
your application, together with all material submitted in support 
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations 
and policies.  In addition, the Board considered the advisory 
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 7 April 
2003, a copy of which is attached. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire 
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was 
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material 
error or injustice.  In this connection, the Board substantially 
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. 
~ccordingly, your application has been denied.  The names and 
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that 
favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have the 
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. 
In this,regard, it is important to keep in mind that a 
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. 

Consequently, when applying  for a correction of an official naval 
record, the burden  is on the applicant to demonstrate the 
existence of probable material  error or  injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN  PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

- 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

H E A D Q U A R T E R S  U N I T E D  S T A T E S  M A R I N E  C O R P S  

3280 R U S S E L L   R O A D  

Q U A N T I C O .   V I R G I N I A   22 134-5 103 

ly VgbY  REFER TO: 

MMER/RE 

R

M

E

W

 

0 7  2003 

Subj:  BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF F

O

NAVAL RECORDS 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

1. - service record has been reviewed and it has 

been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3C was correctly 
assigned.  The reenlistment code was assigned based on his 
overall record of performance and means that he was not eligible 
for reenlistment at the time of separation and the disqualifying 
factor is not covered by another reenlistment code. 

SUBJ: RECODE 

Encl : 

honorably discharged on January 4, 2000 by 

2.  -was 
reason of Completion of Required Active Service.  A review of the 
administrative portion of his service record indicates that he 
was counseled concerning extremely poor judgment and total 
disregard for the tenets of Marine Corps Values by having 
consensual sex with a woman not his wife, allowing a fellow 
Marine to discharge a privately owned weapon aboard a federal 
installation, and not being eligible for reenlistment because of 
poor performance. 

3.  After a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters 
concurs in the professional evaluation of-quali- 
fications for reenlistment at the time of separation.  Once a 
code is correctly assigned it is not routinely changed or 
upgradcd as a result of events that occur after separation or 
based merely on the passage of time. 

4.  The enclosure is returned for final action. 

Head, Performance Evaluation 
Review Branch 
Personnel Management Division 
By direction of the Commandant 
of the Marine Corps 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03176-03

    Original file (03176-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your nayal record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by ~eadquarters Marine Corps dated 11 April 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05894-03

    Original file (05894-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2003. 'service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3F was correctly assigned. It is also noted that on March 22, 1994 he signed an official service record book entry acknowledging assignment of the RE-3F reenlistment code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02963-03

    Original file (02963-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00889-03

    Original file (00889-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects the member's acceptability for reenlistment at the time...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05747-03

    Original file (05747-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 5747-03 20 August 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05745-03

    Original file (05745-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03074-03

    Original file (03074-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Doc ,et No: 3074-03 7 M a v 2003 This is in reference to your application for corr'ectlon of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title States Code, section 1552. of the United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02773-03

    Original file (02773-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 28 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03072-03

    Original file (03072-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 8 April 2003, a copy of which is attached. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02090-03

    Original file (02090-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 5 March 2003, a copy of which is attached.