Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05894-03
Original file (05894-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

BOARD  F O R   C O R R E C T I O N   O F   NAVAL  R E C O R D S  

2  N A V Y A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   20370-5100 

RDZ: jdh 
Docket No.  05894-03 
6 August 2 0 0 3  

This is in reference to your application for correction of your 
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 1 0   of the 
United States Code section 1552. 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval 
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your 
application on 6 August 2003.  Your allegations of error and 
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative 
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this 
Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted 
of your application, together with all material submitted in 
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, 
regulations and policies.  In addition, the Board considered the 
advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 8 
July 2003, a copy of which is enclosed. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire 
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was 
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material 
error or injustice. 

Accordingly, your application has been denied.  The names and 
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon 
request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such 
that favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have 
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and 
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by 
the Board.  In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that 
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. 

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official 
naval record,  the burden  is on the applicant  to demonstrate the 
existence of probable material  error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

Executive Dire 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

H E A D Q U A R T E R S  U N I T E D  S T A T E S   M A R I N E  C O R P S  

3280 R U S S E L L  R O A D  

Q U A N T I C O ,   V I R G I N I A   22 134-5 1 0 3  

I N  REPLY REFER TO: 
1040 
MMER/RE 
301 0 8 2U03 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Subj : 

IN THE CASE OF FORMER 

SUBJ: RECODE 

Encl:  (1) NAVMC 118 (11) of 22 Mar 94 

(2) 

DD Form 149 of 28 May 2003 

1.  'service 

record has been reviewed and it has been 

determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3F was correctly 
assigned.  The reenlistment code was assigned based on his 
overall record and simply means that he failed to complete 
recruit training. 

was separated on March 24, 1994 by reason of 

2. 
Entry Level Performance and Conduct.  A review of his service 
record indicates that he was counseled concerning his inability 
to,adapt to the military environment, and not being recommended 
for reenlistment.  It is also noted that on March 22, 1994 he 
signed an official service record book entry acknowledging 
assignment of the RE-3F reenlistment code.  Enclosure  (1) refers. 

3.  After a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters 
concurs in the professional evaluation of v q u a l i f i -  
cations for reenlistment at the time of separation.  Once a code 
is correctly assigned it is not routinely changed or upgraded as 
a result of events that occur after separation or based merely on 
the passage of time. 

4.  Enclosure  (2) is returned for final action. 

Review Branch 
Personnel Management Division 
By direction of the Commandant 
of the Marine Corps 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05747-03

    Original file (05747-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 5747-03 20 August 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02328-03

    Original file (02328-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 11 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03070-03

    Original file (03070-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. V I R G I N I A 22 134-5 103 ly VgbY REFER TO: MMER/RE R M E W 0 7 2003 Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF F O NAVAL RECORDS MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 1. - service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3C...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02963-03

    Original file (02963-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00889-03

    Original file (00889-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects the member's acceptability for reenlistment at the time...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03176-03

    Original file (03176-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your nayal record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by ~eadquarters Marine Corps dated 11 April 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03074-03

    Original file (03074-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Doc ,et No: 3074-03 7 M a v 2003 This is in reference to your application for corr'ectlon of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title States Code, section 1552. of the United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03072-03

    Original file (03072-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 8 April 2003, a copy of which is attached. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02773-03

    Original file (02773-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 28 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02084-03

    Original file (02084-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 3 March 2003, a copy of which is attached.