DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0
LCC:ecb
Docket No: 444-03
5 August 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 5 August 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 PERS-821 dated 13 June 2003, a copy of which is
attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Executive Direc
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
5420
PERS-821
13 Jun 03
MEMORANDUM FOR SPECIAL ASSISTANT FOR BCNR MATTERS (PERS-OOZCB)
RECOMMENDATIONS ICO
Ref: (a) Your ltr 5420 Pers-OOZCB of 16 May 03
(b) BUPERSINST 1900.8
(c) NCPB, Physical Evaluation Board ltr 1850 PEB:mjm of 23 Apr 97
1. In response to reference (a), the following is provided:
a. Subject named member (SNM) alleges she was erroneously given
the separation code of JFM and should have been given the code of JFN.
Her information is based on a letter signed b
September 1997. The information given in DK1
incorrect, insomuch that reference (b) states that the separation code
JFM is "physical disability which existed prior to entry on active
duty and was established by a physical evaluation board (PEB).
on 30
letter was
b. Per reference (c) SNM was found unfit by the PEB with the
condition of Thoracic scoliosis with back pain that existed prior to
entry (EPTE), not aggravated, not ratable.
c. Accordingly SNM was given the correct separation code of JFM
because the condition was recognized and determined to be EPTE by the
PEB .
2. Point of contact for any further action on this case is CW03 .---
He can be reached at at (901) 874-3201.
. ..
By direction
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05291-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 26 March and 1 April 2002, copies of which...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08010-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03865-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 7220 PERS-823 of 2 July 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01374-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC1:yr.j Docket No: 1374-02 0 July 2002 is After careful evidence injustice. Extraordinary Heroism was sent to the Secretary of the Navy (board of Decorations and Medals) on 08 May 02. request was returned with the board recommendation that a request for determination of NOT BE accorded the. the Navy Pcrsonrzal the Navy approves the recommendation of the e-F.---__._ -.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00028-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject officer's case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06557-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The FMS required for advancement to MS2 for that cycle was 181.58. in the March 1994 (Cycle 143) Navywide 3.-was credited with 4 award points for Cycle 143.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09826-02
c. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), PERS-80, the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) office having cognizance over active and reserve officer career progression matters, has recommended that Petitioner's request to remove his failure of selection by the FY 03 Naval Reserve Line Commander Selection Board be disapproved. e. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), Pers-911, the NPC office having cognizance over Naval Reserve personnel administration, has commented to the effect...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01975-03
Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment). As stated above, references (c) and (d) provided opportunities to "VEAP participants" not 'VEAP-era members. could convert VEAP eligibility to states he was never afforded the he learned of a period of time when was not d. Granting the petitioner's request will not guarantee the Department of Veterans Affairs will award VEAP or MGIB Program benefits since...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09274-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 19 March and 4 and 12 June 2003, copies of which are attached. c. The Bureau of Naval Personnel cannot arbitrarily change the ranking of a member on a “ double ranking ”.It is apparent the member ’s record was changed “Bupers subsequently mandated he provide a fitness report. The member ’s previous report for the period 8 December 1990 to 3 1 October 1991 ranked the member as 3 of 11,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00080-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 80-03 10 June 2003 ” This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2003. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations...