Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00080-03
Original file (00080-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 80-03
10 June 2003

” This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the

provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 10 June 2003.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board.
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Pers 812 of 3 April 2003, a copy of which is
attached.

Docuinentary material considered by the Board consisted of your

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and injustice were

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion.
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 380550000

542 0
PERS-812
3 Apr 03

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters  

(PERS-OOZCB)

Ref:

(a) BCNR 
(b) BUPERSINST  

ltr of 13 Feb 03
1430.16D

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

1.
concerning Petty  

Per reference (a),
Offic

is submitted

Per reference  

2.
and no advancement points can be credited for it.

(b), A ‘Golden Oak Leaf"

is not a personal award



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03480-03

    Original file (03480-03.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum, 5420 PERS-812, 5 June 2003, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06557-02

    Original file (06557-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The FMS required for advancement to MS2 for that cycle was 181.58. in the March 1994 (Cycle 143) Navywide 3.-was credited with 4 award points for Cycle 143.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00959-02

    Original file (00959-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the member should provide...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06789-09

    Original file (06789-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6789-09 20 Oct 09 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 1430 PERS 812 of 14 September 2009, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01576-02

    Original file (01576-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02828-03

    Original file (02828-03.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:lc Docket No: 2828-03 24 June 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01823-03

    Original file (01823-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8 attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02103-03

    Original file (02103-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430, Ser 8 11 A is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06339-02

    Original file (06339-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Pers 812 of 10 September 2002, a copy of which is attached. further action required.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02357-03

    Original file (02357-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.