DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S
2 N A V Y A N N E X
W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 28-03
15 April 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 15 April 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 7220 Pers 822 of 10 March 2003, a copy of which is
attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has bwn d e n i d . The ndme5 and vutzb of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT O F THE NAVY
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
7220
PERS-822
10 Mar 03
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters, PERS-OOZCB
Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION ICO
Ref:
(a) NPC memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 05 Feb 03
(b) DODFMR Vol 7A, Chap 1, Section 010301
Encl :
(1) Statement of Service of 05 Nov 02
(2) BCNR file
1. Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in
subject officer's case. Specifically, Petitioner requests 01E
pay vice 01 pay for having completed four years of prior
enlisted naval service.
2. Per reference (b) commissioned officers are entitled to E
pay if they served over four years of active enlisted service.
Enclosure (1) shows member served four years of active enlisted
service from 8 June 1993 to 7 June 1997. Member's statement of
service for Naval Reserve Retirement shows he did not perform
any annual training (ATs) or active duty for training (ADTs) and
therefore is not entitled to E pay.
3. Enclosure (2) is returned.
- ---
-
Asst Branch Head,
Officer Retirements
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06730-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure (1) shows member served four years of active enlisted service from 1 June 1993 to 31 May 1997, Reserves until he joined the Air Force Reserves on 17 August 1998. a nator: Date of Report: 10/24/01 33 Statement of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07491-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. to document Petitioner's pay entry base date of 9 May Members in NCP do not perform any drills and initial period of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08239-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure (1) shows member served 3 years, 11 months and 29 days of active enlisted service and therefore is not entitled to E pay.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03865-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 7220 PERS-823 of 2 July 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08029-00
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory and policies. 2. certain criteria are entitled to constructive credit. 6 months and 9 days of active duty and was not entitled to Enclosure (1) shows member only completed 19 3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00832-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his retirement on 30 June 1990 was in the grade of chief warrant officer 4 (CWO4), vice chief warrant officer 3 (CW03). (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice RECOMMENDATION: a. y and allowances ‘DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01307-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 7220 is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09563-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This statement identified him as a participant in the SBP Children only coverage, and he took no action to enroll his spouse.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00734-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. automatically b. public Law 105-85 enacted 18 November 1997, authorized SBP participants to voluntarily discontinue SBP participation during the one-year period beginning on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05106-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130C3103U0637 dated 5 September 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.