DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
MEH:ddj
Docket No:
14 May 2002
834 1-O 1
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the
1Jnited States Code, section
1552.
iii_justice
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
and
session, considered your application on
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by
attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
14 May 2002. Your allegations of error
memoranduul 1 160 Pers 8
I 1 of 8 February 2001, a copy of which is
NPC
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
such that favorable, action cannot be taken.
In this regard, it is important
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNE
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-000
NAV Y
L
0
IN REPLY REFER T
O
1160
PERS811
08 Feb 01
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
PERSOOZCB
Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO
Ref:
(a)
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 28 Nov 01
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
In response to reference (a),recommend disapproval of the
1.
petitioner's request.
The petitioner seems to indicatein his petition that he
2 .
should have been eligible for the Obliserve to Train option (OTT).
3.
Due to the fact that the petitioner was already in an SRB
eligible rating (IC),obliserve to train was not authorized.The
petitioner's only option at the time was to hard obliserve for the
orders to "A" school.
In view of the above, recommend disapproval of the
4.
petitioner's request.
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the
5.
Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.Enclosure
is returned.
(1)
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04438-01
Per reference (b), members not SRB eligible who agree to obliserve to train and reenlist for service in a rating or NEC that at the time of the agreement is designated for award of SRB Once the member had may be paid the bonus for that specialty. "B" SRB entitlement for the the time the petitioner attended the training. The petitioner request to adjust the zone "C" SRB d. "B" and receive the higher SRB entitlement to reflect zone entitlement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06029-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner has received the benefits of the extension by accepting the PCS orders and completing the transfer to the new command. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the 3. use by the Board for correction of Naval Records only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05771-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. orders in June 2000 and was in a student status on 01 August 2000. d. The petitioner was advised that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02469-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. d. The petitioner requests clarifications of his zone "C" SRB eligibility and obliserve requirements for BUPERS orders 2340. e. Per reference (c), section (M) note 11, service members must successfully complete formal training and be designated in the new skill at reenlistment to be eligible for SRB at the new skill award level. recommend the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06314-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01837-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend disapproval of the The petitioner received orders that required him to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00495-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by attached. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Enclosure (1) Board for Correction of Naval is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05561-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/395 dtd 21 Aug 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05127-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner was selected to the STA-21 officer program in October 2001. The petitioner requests to receive SRB offered in reference (b) based on the reenlistment of 19 July 2002.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05675-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.