DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
S
MEH:dtl.i
Docket No: 8293-O
I4 May 2002
I
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the
IJnited States Code, section
1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 14 May 2002.
Your allegations of error and
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
subnlitted in support thereof, your naval record and
application, together with all material
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
NPC memorandum
opinion furnished by
attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
Pers
8 1 1 of 8 February 2002, a copy of which is
iIl_iustice
1 160
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished
found that the
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
upon submission of new and material
In this regard, it is important
such that favorable action cannot be taken.
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
Y
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNE
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-000
L
0
IN REPLY REFER T O
116 0
PERS-811
08 Feb 02
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
PERS-OOZCB
Subj
:
BCNR PETITION ICO
Ref :
(a)
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 13
Ott 01
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
In response to reference (a), recommend d
1.
petitioner's request.
.isapproval of the
The petitioner was separated from the Naval Service on 23 July
2.
1991.
year maximum break in active service and was therefore not
entitled to broken service SRB.
Upon his reenlistment in 1999, he had exceeded the four
3. In view of the above,
request.
recommend disapproval of the petitioner's
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the
6.
Board for Correction of Naval
is returned.
Records;lBCNR)
only.
Enclosure
(1)
Reenlistment
Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00177-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05127-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner was selected to the STA-21 officer program in October 2001. The petitioner requests to receive SRB offered in reference (b) based on the reenlistment of 19 July 2002.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06337-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to receive the additional award level for the LSRB UIC 44321. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for' the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08260-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07975-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's request This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the (1) 3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07770-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 April 2002. Docu~iientary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all niaterial subniitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner reenlisted early on 29 September 2001 for four years at the request of the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08099-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's request This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the 3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06615-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. At the time of the petitioner's reenlistment on 21 February 1991, - 0430 or STG reference (b) was in effect.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04790-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08129-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's request be This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the 3.