DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
MEH:ddj
Docket No: 8129-01
15 January 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Pers 8 11 of 4 December 2001, a copy of which is
attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
bEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNE
5720 INTEGRITY DRIV
MILLINGTON TN 38055-000
L
E
0
IN REPLY REFER T
O
1160
PERS-811
04 DEC 01
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
Subj:
Ref:
PERS-OOZCB
BCNR PETITION ICO IT1
(a)
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 13 September 2001
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
In response to reference (a),
1.
petitioner's request.
recommend disapproval of the
a.
The petitioner's statement indicates that the reason for
the expiration of his SRB eligibility was his own indecision as to
whether or not he was going to continue his Naval career.
b.
member,
There was no error or injustice caused by any military
employee or organization in this situation.
In view of the above,
2.
disapproved.
recommend the petitioner's request be
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the
3.
Board for Correction of Naval Records
is returned.
(BCNR)
only.
Enclosure (1)
Assist&t,
Reenlistment
Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07975-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's request This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the (1) 3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05024-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 2001. reference The petitioner graduated from HM "C" school on 18 April At the time the petitioner negotiated and received...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06429-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08099-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's request This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the 3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07167-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Board for Correction of Naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07770-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 April 2002. Docu~iientary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all niaterial subniitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner reenlisted early on 29 September 2001 for four years at the request of the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04790-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06615-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. At the time of the petitioner's reenlistment on 21 February 1991, - 0430 or STG reference (b) was in effect.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08536-01
A three-member panel of rhe Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, consitleretl your application 011 18 June 2002. I n addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientioi~s consideration of the entire record, h e Board found that the evidence subn~itted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or I n this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the co~nnients contained in ili.justice. This is an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08341-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, it is important Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE BUREAU OF...