DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
MEH:ddj
Docket No: 8280-01
20 February 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 20 February 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Pers 811 of 30 January 2002, a copy of which is
attached.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. Backdating your reenlistment of 7 November 2001 to 22 September 2001 (prior to
“B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus
passing through zone
(SRB). You had not completed CTR “A” school by that date and therefore you could not be
qualified for a zone
In this connection, the Board did not concur
with the
Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
recommedation contained in the advisory opinion.
“B”), would not entitle you to a zone
“B” SRB for the CTR rating.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
Docket No: 8280-01
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all
official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNE
5720 INTEGRITY DRIV
MILLINGTON TN 38055-000
L
E
0
O
IN REPLY REFER T
1160
PERS-811
30 Jan 02
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
PERS-OOZCB
Subj :
BCNR PETITION ICO
Ref:
Encl:
(a)
SNM's DD Form 149
dtd 08 Nov 01
(1) BCNR File
In response to reference
1.
petitioner's request.
(a), recommend approval of the
The petitioner crossed from Zone B to Zone C eligibility on 23
2.
September 2001.
The petitioner had orders to CTR "A" school with a class
3.
convening date of 22 May 01 and a projected graduation date of 26
September 2001.
graduated early and reenlisted prior to crossing out of Zone B
eligibility.
It is possible that the petitioner could have
Due to a backlog at DONCAF due to restructuring, the
4.
petitioner's request for security clearance was not completed in
sufficient time to allow him to make his 22 May 01 class convening
date,
crossed out of Zone B eligibility.
did not graduate until well after he
and as a result,
In view of the above,
5.
executed by the petitioner on 07 November 2001 be expunged and a
reenlistment be effected on 22
six year Zone B SRB qualifying
September 2001
recommend that the six year reenlistment
USN
PNC1(
'Fj)
j
Head
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06287-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend that a Zone B qualifying This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the 5.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06028-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03215-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. This was more than a month after you had reenlisted. 2. reenlistment date of 13 August 1999 to 04 October 1999 for four years.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07306-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. change will give the member an EAOS of 27 September 2003. recommend the petitioner's enlistment This Additionally, this change will allow the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00844-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner reenlisted on 29 May 1992 for four years to The petitioner's EAOS at the time of continue active service. reference (c), from 21 months the petitioner the zone of did not reenlist on 09 September 1993. continues service to six years.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05241-02
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. zone the petitioner's reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03259-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 mh MEH: Docket No: 9 July 2002 3259-02 Dear This is in reference to your application provisions of title 10 of the Ilnitctl States Code, section 1552. iOr correcticm 01‘ your naval record pursuant to the ot‘ the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive panel three-nlember- A session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with proceedings of this Board. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07191-02
The petitioner were issued orders on 20 February 2001 from the Enlisted Personnel Management Management Center New Orleans, LA to The return to active duty for disenrollment from petitioner reenlisted on 10 July 2001 for six years and received a zone "B" SRB entitlement for NEC 3354. the' NROTC Program. d. The petitioner request to receive all SRB installments and "C" School for the previous reenlistment prior to entering guaranteed the BOOST Program. However, the member is In view of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08756-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner reenlisted on 02 January 2001 for four "C" SRB entitlement for the The petitioner received 47 months...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08260-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...