Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07826-02
Original file (07826-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY

3OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVYANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

MEH: ddj
Docket No: 7826-02
17 December 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
ap,lication on 17 December 2002. Your allegations of error and
session, considered your 
injustice were reviewed in 
a.ccordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to. the proceedings of this 
BDard. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by 
a copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 

32/6207 of 13 November 2002,

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was 
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this 
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

connectior , the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter no: previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a 
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

correctl.on of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND

5722 INTEGRITY DR.

MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 380546057

IN REPLY REFER TO:

1133
Ser 
13  NOV  02

32/6207

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Commander, 
Executive 

I!
Di

v-y Recruiting Command
.ector,

Board for Correction of Naval Records

BCNR 

REQUESI

ICO

(a) COMNAVCI

rITCOMINST  

1130.8F

(1)  BCNR  

Dot

:et Nr.

07826-02

Recommend 

disar
1.
the applicant is ar
III Enlistment  
Pros
Cryptologic Technic

An Enlistment I
2 .
and annexes from al
are provided to  
ver
District 
Commandin<
dot
did not provide  
approval.

Iroval  of enclosure (1).
OSVET.
'am.
an is correct.

Only 

Her enlistment contract  

for  4Y0

NAVE%~~~  enlist under the PRISE

Per reference (a),

Inus (EB) may be guaranteed only if the DD-4

previous active duty and reserve enlistments
fy that no previous EB has been awarded.
Officer pre-approval of EB is required.
.ments showing Commanding Officer 
pre-

 

SNM

This is an  

advj
3 .
Correction of Naval

ory memorandum for use by the Board for
Records only.

Enclosure (1) is returned.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00370-02

    Original file (00370-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B;OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 370-02 22 Janaury 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive on 22 Janaury 2003. in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory 32/6040 of 8 April 2002, a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06127-02

    Original file (06127-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member p session, considered your injustice were reviewed in to the proceedings of this your application, together opinion furnished by NA copy of which is attached. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ith all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and RUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/6197 of 4 October 2002, a In addition, the Board considered the advisory n of the entire record, the Board found that the cient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01078-02

    Original file (01078-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I application, together with all applicable statutes, regulation opinion furnished by NAVCI of which is attached. Your allegations of error and injustice vith administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the ~umentary material considered by the Board consisted of your material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory JITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/6118 of 11 June 2002, a copy After careful and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02240-02

    Original file (02240-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02275-02

    Original file (02275-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. When he returned to active duty, SNM is a Navy Veteran who Per enclosure (1) His This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2 .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02472-02

    Original file (02472-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05463-02

    Original file (05463-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUICOM copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00870-02

    Original file (00870-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1 133 Ser of which is attached. Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00282-02

    Original file (00282-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVYCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01203-02

    Original file (01203-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. administiative regulations and procedures applicable to the In addition, the Board considered the advisory NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/6064 of 23 April 2002, a After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was...