Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00282-02
Original file (00282-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX

NAVY 

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

Y

S

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 282-02
4 September 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 4 September 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NAVYCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser
copy of which is attached.

Your allegations of error and

32/6163  of 12 August 2002, a

 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND

5722 INTEGRITY DR.

MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 38054-5057

IN REPLY REFER TO:

1133
Ser 
I2  

32/61L3
II,%  
02

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Commander,
Executive Director,

Navy Recruiting Command

Board for Correction of Naval Records

BCNR REQUEST ICO

(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST  

1130.8F

Encl:

(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 00282-02

Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).

1.
OSVETS honorably discharged in  
enlistment 
paygrade  held at time of discharge,
E-3.
on a case-by-case basis by the Enlisted Community Manager.

criteria,will  be enlisted at one  

Requests to enlist  

Per reference (a),
paygrade  E-3 and above, who meet

but no lower than 

paygrade  lower than
paygrade

paygrade  E-5 and above will be approved

This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for

2.
Correction of Naval Records. only.

Enclosure (1) is returned.

By dire

t'on
@

1.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07656-02

    Original file (07656-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Time in rate is always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS returning in a lower paygrade.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07972-02

    Original file (07972-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND 5722 INTEGRITY DR. MILLINGTON. Time in rate is always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS returning in a lower paygrade.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02090-02

    Original file (02090-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S ā€˜2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 2090-02 17 September 2002 iā€ This is in reference to your application for correction of your provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08767-02

    Original file (08767-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP : ddj Docket No: 8767-02 14 January 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08644-02

    Original file (08644-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02472-02

    Original file (02472-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00370-02

    Original file (00370-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B;OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 370-02 22 Janaury 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive on 22 Janaury 2003. in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory 32/6040 of 8 April 2002, a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00870-02

    Original file (00870-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1 133 Ser of which is attached. Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01203-02

    Original file (01203-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. administiative regulations and procedures applicable to the In addition, the Board considered the advisory NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/6064 of 23 April 2002, a After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02389-02

    Original file (02389-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per enclosure (1) paygrade determination was initially made the This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2.