DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
JLP:ddj
Docket No: 5463-02
24 September 2002
This is in reference to your application
provisions of title IO of the United States Code, section
l-or correction of your naval record pursuant to the
1552.
tin 24 September 2002. Your allegations of error and
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NAVCRUICOM
copy of which is attached.
Illtslnori~~i(illll1 1133 Ser
32/6174 of 27 August 2002, a
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND
5722 INTEGRITY DR.
MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE
38054-5057
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1133
Ser 32
/6-l
z 7
,_\ .:,
ij
,‘I
q7
~;I,-
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Commander,
Executive Director,
Navy Recruiting Command
Board for Correction of Naval Records
BCNR REQUEST ICO
(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST
(b) PHONCON BUPERS MACM ISAZA
i130.8F
OS2 GUIDRY (N32213) of 21 Aug 02
(N132D14)/ COMNAVCRUITCOM
Encl:
(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 05463-02
Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).
1.
references (a) and (b),
Enlisted Community Manager,
too great to warrant enlistment
Per enclosure
(l),
,break in service was
after contacting the Master-at-Arms
in the
paygrade of E-5.
This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for
2.
Correction of Naval Record? only.
Enclosure (1) is returned.
By
direc
on
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06122-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00870-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1 133 Ser of which is attached. Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02311-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02231-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05306-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02389-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per enclosure (1) paygrade determination was initially made the This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05396-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01713-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07656-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Time in rate is always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS returning in a lower paygrade.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03644-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. a copy of which opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.