Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07063-02
Original file (07063-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 7063-02
26 November 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420  
which is attached.

1/02UO583  of 29 October 2002, a copy of

N130D 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly,  your application has   been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF
WASHINGTON. D.C.

  NAV Y
  NAVAL OPERATIONS
 

20350-2000

2000 NAVY PENTAGO

N

IN REPLY REFER TO

5420
N130Dl/ 02110583
29 

Ott 2002

MEMORANDUM FOR THE

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,
NAVAL RECORDS

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE 0

$P?,

.>
,,'I

Encl:

(1) BCNR case file  

#07063-02 with microfiche service record

The following provides comment and recommendation on Petty

1.
Office

petition.

N130 recommends denial of Petty Officer

2.
an Enlistment Bonus (EB).

#petition  for

Petty Officer

3.
enlisted in the Nava
Immediate Reenlistment Contract.

left active duty on 22 July 2001 and
eserve on  23 July 2001 through an

In his petition, Petty Officer

requests favorable action that would allow his current
contract be voided and replaced with a DD Form 4 contract to
allow payment of an EB.

4. In accordance with OPNAVINST  
must enlist in  
Petty Officer
for an EB.
is not entitled to an EB.

1160.6A,  prior service members
paygrade E-3 or below if establishing eligibility

enlisted as an E-4 and therefore

BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned

5.
herewith as enclosure (1).

Programs Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02407-02

    Original file (02407-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 1113 22 Nov 2002 OD/02U0660 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05754-02

    Original file (05754-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. NAV Y IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/02U0587 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: RECOMMENDATION SE OF PETTY OFFICER \ Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05754-02 with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03209-02

    Original file (03209-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Every recruit is not offered nor receives an EB is guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4. does not have an EB contract in his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00952-02

    Original file (00952-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DC 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 / Dl 0 13 N 22 Nov 2002 OZUO650 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 1 Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #00952-02 with microfiche service record 1. for an Enlistment Bonus (EB). Navy Recruiting Command and the Petty does not have an EB contract in his service record is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02888-02

    Original file (02888-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Officer record and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06349-02

    Original file (06349-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. an EB. Petty Officer received an EB contract upon entry into the DEP.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04588-02

    Original file (04588-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ‘I JLP: ddj Docket No: 4588-02 8 October 2002 This is in reference provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. to.your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04584-02

    Original file (04584-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In accordance with BUPERS message 231454AUG99, (message in effect at the time Petty Officer Siienaiaie.. entered the DEP), the NF Program Was eligible for an EB of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02811-02

    Original file (02811-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. An EB College Kicker is an EB and is governed Every recruit is not offered nor The EB program is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00175-02

    Original file (00175-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. 20310-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 542 0 N130Dl/o2~0580 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #00175-02 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Petty 1. Navy Recruiting Command and the 1160.6A "members enrolling in .