Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00952-02
Original file (00952-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 952-02
17 December 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420  
of which is attached.

N130D1/02U0650 of 22 November 2002, a copy

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

  NAV Y

2000 NAVY PENTAGON

WASHINGTON. 

DC 20350-2000

IN REPLY REFER TO

5420
/ Dl 
0 
13 
N 
22 Nov 2002

OZUO650

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

1

Subj:

COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER

Encl:

(1) BCNR case file  

#00952-02 with microfiche service record

1.

The following provides

comment and recommendation on Petty

N130 recommends denial of Petty Officer

2 .
for an Enlistment Bonus (EB).

petition

Petty Office

3.
Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on   26 April  2000  and volunteered for
the Advanced Electronic
Petty Officer
petition,
would allow payment of

In his
ers Field Guarantee.
requests favorable action that

nlisted in the Navy through the

an EB.

EB is not an entitlement,

but a recruiting tool used at the
4.
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to
The EB program is budgeted based on
enlist in critical skills.
quotas provided by the Commander,
Enlisted Community Managers, not by the number of "A" School
accession seats.
EB is guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4.

Every recruit is not offered nor receives an EB.

Navy Recruiting Command and the

Petty

does not have an EB contract in his service record
is not entitled to an EB.

BCNR  case file with microfiche service record is returned

5.
herewith as enclosure (1).

.

&c@
Head, Enlisted Bonus
Programs Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02888-02

    Original file (02888-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Officer record and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03209-02

    Original file (03209-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Every recruit is not offered nor receives an EB is guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4. does not have an EB contract in his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00175-02

    Original file (00175-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. 20310-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 542 0 N130Dl/o2~0580 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #00175-02 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Petty 1. Navy Recruiting Command and the 1160.6A "members enrolling in .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02407-02

    Original file (02407-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 1113 22 Nov 2002 OD/02U0660 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02895-02

    Original file (02895-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. an Enlistment Bonus (EB).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02626-02

    Original file (02626-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. The EB program is budgeted based on Navy Recruiting Command and the and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04050-02

    Original file (04050-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Nuclear Field Program he was disqualified from the Petty Officer Reed requests favorable action that would allow payment of $4,000 EB . basic qualification for the EB, from required schools and who do not continue in the skill for Petty which enlisted, Officer did not complete the required...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06349-02

    Original file (06349-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. an EB. Petty Officer received an EB contract upon entry into the DEP.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02990-02

    Original file (02990-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 12 AU8 2002 02UO428 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: CASE 0 Encl: (1) BCNR case file #02990-02 with microfiche service record 1. entitled to that payment upon completion of his He is not entitled to an EB College Kicker has a valid EB Contract in the amount of Kicker Program was not in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04588-02

    Original file (04588-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ‘I JLP: ddj Docket No: 4588-02 8 October 2002 This is in reference provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. to.your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative...