Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02811-02
Original file (02811-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 28 1 l-02
4 September 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420  
which is attached

N130D1/02U0449 of 12 August 2002, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

Y

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

2000  NAVY PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000

IN REPLY REFER TO

542 0
N13 
12  Aug  2002

ODl/ 

02UO449

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

SE OF

Encl:

(1) BCNR case file  

#02811-02  with microfiche service record

provides
petition.

comment and recommendation on

N130  recommends denial of

2 .
for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) College Kicker.

petition

on 30 March 2001,

entered the Delayed Entry Program

3 .
(DEP)
Electrical/Computer Field (SECF) Program Guarantee, and signed
an EB contract in the amount of
action that would allow payment of an EB College Kicker in
addition to the EB that is included in his contract.

volunteered for the Submarine

$13,000.

 

He requests favorable

but a recruiting tool used at the

EB is not an entitlement,

4 .
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals
to enlist in critical skills.
on quotas provided by the Commander,
the Enlisted Community Managers, not by the number of "A" School
accession seats.
under the preceding rules.
receives an EB College Kicker.

An EB College Kicker is an EB and is governed

Every recruit is not offered nor

The EB program is budgeted based

Navy Recruiting Command and

0 and is

has a valid EB Contract in the amount
entitled to that payment upon completion of his

5 .
of $13,00
training pipeline and qualification in the skill for which he was
offered the EB.
because it was not offered by his classifier nor included in his
contract upon entrance into the Navy.

He is not entitled to an EB College Kicker

BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned

6 .
herewith as enclosure (1).

COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION

IN THE CASE OF

PETTY OFFICER

Head,
Programs Branch

Enlisted Bonus



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07245-02

    Original file (07245-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP : ddj Docket No: 26 November 2002 7245-02 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. h A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. In addition, the Board considered the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07383-02

    Original file (07383-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 20350-2000 54rQl@PLV REFER TO N130D1/02U0589 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NAVAL RECORDS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Subj : HE CASE 0 Encl: (1) BCNR case file #07383-02 with microfiche service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04972-02

    Original file (04972-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition; the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04268-02

    Original file (04268-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Seaman 2001. and signed an EB contract in the to Recruit Training Command (RTC) requests.favorable action that Kicker in addition to the EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the 4. discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to enlist in critical skills. Correction of Naval Records, Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02990-02

    Original file (02990-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 12 AU8 2002 02UO428 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: CASE 0 Encl: (1) BCNR case file #02990-02 with microfiche service record 1. entitled to that payment upon completion of his He is not entitled to an EB College Kicker has a valid EB Contract in the amount of Kicker Program was not in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05739-02

    Original file (05739-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/ 29 Ott 2002 02UO582 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF, I T Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05739-02 with microfiche service record 1. Every recruit is not offered nor The EB program is budgeted based Navy Recruiting Command and Seaman,mhas a valid EB Contract...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07125-02

    Original file (07125-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. would allow payment of an EB College Kicker in addition to the EB that is included in her contract. Every recruit is not offered nor The EB program is budgeted based Navy Recruiting Command and s a valid EB Contract in the amount of $4,000 5. that payment upon completion of her training an pipeline and qualification in the skill for which she was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06671-02

    Original file (06671-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION CASE OF SEAMAN

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00249-02

    Original file (00249-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02407-02

    Original file (02407-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 1113 22 Nov 2002 OD/02U0660 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...